Even free market purists don’t think the invisible hand is the only one we can extend to the poorest among us.
Towards the end of last year, Pope Leo XIV released his first Apostolic Exhortation, titled Dilexi Te (Latin for “I have loved you”). Many of the major themes of this exhortation closely carried over from the themes developed by Francis in his papacy.
Included in this is a specific ethical focus on economic actions and economic systems. The exhortation spans nearly 20,000 words, covers significant ground, and maintains a central focus on God’s love for the poor. The pope argues that the dignity of the poor is central both in scripture and in the history of the Roman Catholic Church.
I agree with much of what Leo has to say throughout the exhortation, so I will focus most of my comments on the area where I would differ most sharply from him — on the economic system.
Paragraph 92 in particular addresses economic policy. Leo says:We must continue, then, to denounce the “dictatorship of an economy that kills,” and to recognize that “while the earnings of a minority are growing exponentially, so too is the gap separating the majority from the prosperity enjoyed by those happy few. This imbalance is the result of ideologies that defend the absolute autonomy of the marketplace and financial speculation. Consequently, they reject the right of states, charged with vigilance for the common good, to exercise any form of control. A new tyranny is being born, invisible and often virtual, which unilaterally and relentlessly imposes its own laws and rules.” There is no shortage of theories attempting to justify the present state of affairs or to explain that economic thinking requires us to wait for invisible market forces to resolve everything. Nevertheless, the dignity of every human person must be respected today, not tomorrow, and the extreme poverty of all those to whom this dignity is denied should constantly weigh upon our consciences.When reading this, I felt mostly surprised by the characterization of our current situation. A significant chunk of this involves a quote from Pope Francis’ Evangelii Gaudium, wherein he claims inequality has bred ideologies that defend absolute autonomy of the marketplace against state regulation.
The difficulty I find here is that, insofar as these ideologies have been bred (which I’m unsure of), they appear not to have been very successful. Regulation and regulatory agencies continue to outpace market freedom in the West. While measuring this isn’t easy, we have some indications. The Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World Report shows the current economic freedom score of the US is 8.1 out of 10. This is the fifth-lowest score since The Fraser Institute started keeping annual data in 2000.
...read more at thedailyeconomy.org
pull down to refresh
related posts
Yes, sadly this is another case of 2 sides looking at the same problem but diagnosing it differently.
Its absolutely true that the wealth gap is growing, its absolutely true that excessive financial speculation is a problem (its easier to speculate than to actually build things which would help actually employee people), etc.
However a primary cause of these issues is money printing, which is a state-sponsored function.
So its illogical to create a false dichotomy of "state vs rampant economic machine", since it is the state that created that machine.
Side note: The first real life bitcoin get together I went to (I forget the year but maybe was 2017), what impressed me the most was the number of hard core leftist there. I was coming from Austrian / Ancap view, so was surprised to see actual socialist at the get together....that told me Bitcoin was actually going to be something, since the far-left and right were both seeing it as a tool to improve the world.
Do you think those lefties are still bitcoiners?
I've thought about that and I honestly don't know. The total get together was maybe 50 people and there was a group of 5 or 6 socialist (maybe more)....I say that because during one of the speeches they started a back and forth with the speaker where they were advocating for gov involvement in bitcoin to 'regulate it'. They were loudly booed, which then escalated to them outing themselves as saying capitalism is evil, etc etc.
I somehow think that they either adopted more austrian views, or perhaps they moved off to some shitcoin project, or who knows maybe they are still with us....however what struck me at the time was that the online presence of bitcoin (ie. bitcointalk.org and /r/bitcoin) was basically libertarian only vibes. So they were either lurking or maybe more likely bitcoin is discussed on other leftist forums that I never saw....
There’s a pretty decent pitch that can be made to progressives. I think you’re right though about them drifting away from statism once they get in.
Yes and I do wish that bitcoin messaging focused more on the tangible social benefits of having sound money, rather than pure NGU or semi-irrelevant tech-bro debates about quantum computing, NFTs, covenants, etc.
Having people see clearly what the problem is (ie. money printing) is arguably more important for society than just direct bitcoin advocacy....and regardless bitcoin is the natural beneficiary of such thinking.
So, the only economic ideology that kills is the one that lifts the poorest people out of poverty everywhere it’s tried?
Not the one that’s in place everywhere that people are actually starving?
Great article, and great points
Sadly, it seems to stem from a general lack of economic literacy in the population, including the pope I guess