The ability to bet on anything, not surprisingly, means the ability to have corrupt and rigged bets in way more than sports or stocks. I'd expect a lot more of this (see also the famously rigged Karoline Leavitt speech a few months back).
pull down to refresh
Betting on anything is basically an open invitation for insider shenanigans. This case just shows the obvious: if there’s money to exploit, someone will try.
That's a total waste of the court's time. It's a prediction market. The whole point is to have accurate predictions.
Obviously, insiders have the best predictions.
The issue here is the KYC on the platform...