pull down to refresh
The masses are ruled by philosophy.
Bitcoiners can barely get over their own brilliance, let alone influence others; one must wonder how remarkable the bitcoiner is, for having the most obvious thing in all human history, yet to be so incapable of pitching almost anything effectively.
If there were a grand, Dionysian bitcoiner taking over the world, he would be noticed, so he does not yet exist.
If there were a grand, Dionysian bitcoiner taking over the world, he would be noticed, so he does not yet exist.
No he wouldn't. 99% of the population would think he's a bumbling moron and a solid majority of Bitcoiners would agree. To be a genius means to be misunderstood and hated most of the time.
You can't make a better pitch for Bitcoin because the use case doesn't align with what everyone wants. Not everyone wants to make more money for less work. Not everyone values their own life.
a bumbling moron [who's secretly a genius!]
Interesting image of a superman you have there...
Not everyone values their own life.
Ironic :)
You think average people would recognize a superman if they saw one? They don't. Stupid doesn't see genius.
An invisible genius is no different from masturbation. Try again.
Not invisible. He's very visible. I'm saying no one sees that he's a genius.
No one can tame the masses. At best one can menace them into temporary submission. One could reshape the world by inspiring other men of the mind to separate themselves from the masses through individual example.
Although, there's certainly a place for militarized Bitcoin when it comes to dealing with the intrusive elements of masses and their revolutions. Purely out of self-defense of course.