I see your point and thanks for sharing the warrant. Maybe it could have been linked on the website.

My point was that, in the event of crime, it might be helpful in warning the general public. In a murder case you'd want to know if the weapon was a blunt instrument or a firearm. Ideally, in a 'drug bust' that happened across the street, you'd want to know if the seized narcotic agents were marijuana or fentanyl. At least I would feel it might have an influence on my safety. I assume that statements to the press aim to disseminate information to help the reader understand the accusations and the version of events that led to the arrest. I suppose that the secret service has impunity from their own methods of dragnet surveillance. Not that I would expect to read technicalities, like how the hack actually occured.

"Russian Nationals Charged With .. " and "As cyber criminals have become more sophisticated in their methods of thievery, our career prosecutors and law enforcement partners, too, have become experts in the latest technologies being abused for malicious purposes,” seem timely. Perhaps DOJ might care to explain how and what exaclty this has to do with the accusations. I'm not au fait with US criminal proceedings but in general, press releases seem to be nothing more than sound bites aimed at steering public opinion, or dissuading any appetite for understanding and leads to verdicts based on emoition predicated by a lack of relevant facts.