pull down to refresh

Not the best situation. Are they still on separate UTXOs/addresses but under the same xpub? In that case the situation may still be salvageable. If the UTXOs have touched each other (merged or address reused), the former non-KYC coins can pretty much be considered KYC by now.
Thank You for Your help. They are now under the same xpub but on seperated utxos. Was a cold wallet migration and an additional non-kyc amount.
reply
Good to hear! Addresses cannot be linked back to a common xpub by themselves unless they appear in the same transaction graph.
Be very careful and use a wallet that supports coin/UTXO selection and send only the non-KYC coins to another (new?) wallet. And do your best to NEVER accidentally put KYC coins into the empty address left behind. Wallets should typically avoid reuse AFAIK but you could go extra paranoid and also move the KYC coins to a new wallet and retire the old one to completely avoid that risk.
reply
It's a Jade...
reply
deleted by author
reply
Don't have experience with Jade, but sounds good to use Sparrow or other coin control-supporting wallet software paired with the Jade to sign the transactions.
reply
deleted by author
reply
It supports cc... seems good so far. Thank You!!
reply