pull down to refresh
related posts
10 sats \ 3 replies \ @l0k18 25 Jul 2023
If I understand this all correctly, it also solves the "everyone can have a channel" problem too.
This makes the road to merchant adoption a lot smoother, and lowers the overall cost and may reduce some of the difficulties with liquidity management.
Haha. And coinjoins. So much gravy!
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @shibe 26 Jul 2023
While splicing has a smaller on-chain footprint than looping in/out, or closing and reopening a larger channel it still doesn't completely solve the issue of everyone being able to have a channel. Ultimately it's still not possible to reallocate liquidity off-chain, that would probably require eltoo or hierarchical channels
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Lorenzo OP 25 Jul 2023
Unfortunately, it doesn't solves the "everyone can have a channel" issue. We're still limited by the total supply and block time on layer one. But I see it as a step for better usability when LN has this kind of demand!
The coinjoin part is really exciting, tho :D
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @l0k18 25 Jul 2023
I think it does have a lot of uses that will defer a channel closure so it does increase the number of channels and the pressure on the fee market from LN.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @endothermicdev 25 Jul 2023
Nice writeup! I'm very excited for splicing adoption, and it ought to be a game changer for Phoenix specifically. Also hat tip to @niftynei for laying the groundwork with the dual-funding spec and implementation (which also does a coinjoin!)
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Lorenzo OP 25 Jul 2023
Thanks!
reply