Trezor is working with Wasabi for Coinjoins, Wasabi is working with chananalysis companies and it uses to the best of my knowledge from the research I have done, peelchain instead of the recommended ZeroLink, it is advised to verify, do the research and not trust. I have done mine and wouldn't touch Wasabi, nor Trezor after this business deal with Wasabi.
Few articles on the matter:
Recommended Book:
  • https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/57356067-the-cryptopians
    • revelations from journalist Laura Shin’s new book The Cryptopians, which tracks Ethereum’s early years, showed that Wasabi failed to follow the aptly named protocol ZeroLink.
    • ZeroLink requires “zero linking” of mixed and unmixed Bitcoin. Wasabi used a ZeroLink alternative called “peelchain.” The wallet was released in 2017
reply
That criticism is against Wasabi 1.0, Wasabi 2.0 uses WabiSabi coinjoins, which are different, there is no "toxic change" anymore.
reply
deleted by author
reply
deleted by author
reply
They support shitcoins. So they are our enemy.
reply
deleted by author
reply
You are kidding, man? Satoshilabs made so much for entire bitcoin ecosystem and adoption, and you call them "our" enemy, cuz they have an optionality in HW? Cmon...
reply
Don't care. They actively support our enemy (shitcoins), so they are an enemy aswell in my eyes. Bitcoin only, O-N-L-Y, is the only path
reply
Brand loyalty - they weren't always full of shitcoins. It's not always simple for people to change brands, it's like apathy but not quite. What's that word for finding comfort in the familiar?
reply