pull down to refresh
100 sats \ 2 replies \ @petertodd 16 Nov 2023
"Making a name for myself" is a strong motivation to help out in open source and open protocols. Taking that away from people is going to inevitably discourage contributions.
Bad move.
reply
125 sats \ 1 reply \ @pablof7z__ 17 Nov 2023
any idiot can write a spec. If someone wants to make a name for themselves they should write useful software or launch a valuable business.
Whoever gets discouraged from writing a spec because of this would be the right kind of person to discourage from proposing a spec.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @fiatjaf 17 Nov 2023
Yes, exactly. We already have more than enough academic type people writing retarded overengineered unimplementable and completely useless specs in the world. I heard the W3C has a role for them though.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 16 Nov 2023
I misread this title as “Remove all NIPs authored by fiatjaf”
Obviously that is very different.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @03d8676a74 17 Nov 2023
Next
reply
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 16 Nov 2023
@ fiatjaf
I think it's a good argument, and it makes sense to take the emotion out of personal relationships. That's why SN zaps are "anonymous".
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 16 Nov 2023
It'll be interesting to see the impact this has on the protocol. It's a subtle change but it's a change to incentives which could have big downstream consequences.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @pablof7z__ 17 Nov 2023
yes, slightly removes the incentive of people writing nonsense because they want to be a "nostr core developer"
reply