pull down to refresh

Think that the idea of our own money printing is crazy?
What if a state owned money printer is given the license to print another nation's bills?
According to an article by the in the South China Morning Post, The China Banknote Printing and Minting Corporation, a state-owned company, who prints both China's Renminbi coins and bank notes, had license to print the fiat bills of Nepal, Thailand, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, India, Brazil and Poland for tose countries.
Sources contacted in the 2018 article suggest the nation list might be longer still but may be unwilling to make this public.
The reluctance of nations to admit they are subcontracting their nation's money printing is understandable because it shows their national sovereignty is being undermined and that it poses as a national security threat.
Although carrying out this process for others, China see their own printing and minting as highly sensitive]:
Beijing has regarded money printing capability as being as crucial as its atomic bomb programme to its national security amid fears its enemies could use fake notes to disrupt the economy.
The security concerns are obvious, as well as the potential for malicious money printing which would exacerbate a nation's inflation, there's also the potential for maliciously restricting the other nation's monetary supply.
One example of monetary disruption by a foreign printer happened in Libya when The British government was able to seize freshly printed Libyan dinars due to the fact the money printers, De La Rue, were British - this can be said to have helped the Libyan government fall in 2011.
The ability for foreign printers to hold sway over the currency of another nation is not unique to China or Britain - there's also Giesecke & Devrient* in Germany and Crane Currency in the U.S. who also print banknotes for Central Banks in other countries.
For anyone interested in reading more, read the following 2018 article from the South China Morning Post -which inspired me to write this post.
The archived link, and article, is shown below.

Why other countries are giving China a licence to print money

Chinese state-owned firm winning contracts to print foreign currencies as country seeks to expand reach and influence.
By contrast, its US counterpart, the US Bureau of Engraving and Printing, employs a tenth of the staff at two currency factories; the world’s number two, the British firm De La Rue, had slightly more than 3,100 employees at the end of last year.
Thailand is one of the countries that has outsourced its currency production to China.
In China, the rise of mobile payments in recent years has significantly reduced the use of and demand for banknotes.
From big cities to remote villages, smartphones have become wallets, with most transactions in grocery stores now carried out digitally, leaving many printing plants short of work.
But the resulting lull ended suddenly earlier this year.
The nation’s largest currency paper mill in Baoding, Hebei province, sprang into action with the sudden arrival of “big orders”, according to an employee working in the 604 Factory, a subsidiary of the corporation.
“Our machines have been running at full steam for months”, according to another employee working at the facility.
Indeed, the sudden rush in orders has left the factory scrambling to keep up.
The process of producing banknotes involves turning fine cotton and linen fibres to pulp, which is then made into high quality money paper with anti-counterfeiting water marks.
But the process requires a lot of steam, supplied by the local generating plant, and the resulting power demands have left the whole city struggling to maintain the accelerated pace of production.
“The steam shortage remains a headache. We have filed a complaint to the city government. They are looking for a solution. So far the steam shortage has not had too much of an impact on the output,” another employee said on Monday.
The rise of mobile payments has hit demand for cash in China.
Another currency paper mill in Kunshan, Jiangsu province, reported a similar change.
“Last year was particularly bad. We had almost nothing to do,” an employee said.
“We had no choice but to make marriage certificates and driving licences to keep the production line from rusting. This year the workload is full,” he said.
Most of the banknotes the mills were producing were not yuan, the employee said.
“The processing is different. Currency paper varies from country to another and each client has its own requirements.”
The employees all requested not to be named due to the secrecy of their work.
According to Liu Guisheng, president of the China Banknote Printing and Minting Corporation, China did not print foreign currencies until recently.
But in 2013, Beijing launched the belt and road plan, a global development blueprint involving about 60 countries from Asia, Europe to Africa to stimulate economic growth with large-scale capital investment and infrastructure construction projects.
Two years later, China started printing 100-rupee notes for Nepal, Liu wrote in an article in China Finance, a bi-monthly journal run by China’s central bank in May.
Since then, the company “seized the opportunities brought by the initiative” and “successfully won contracts for currency production projects in a number of countries, including Thailand, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, India, Brazil and Poland,” he said.
That could be just the tip of the iceberg. The actual number of countries that plan to outsource currency printing to China could be much bigger, according to one source in the corporation.
Some governments have asked Beijing not to publicise their deals because they worry that such information could compromise national security or trigger “unnecessary debates at home”, the person said.
Hu Xingdou, a professor of economics at the Beijing Institute of Technology, said that a country must have considerable trust in the Chinese government to allow it to print its banknotes.
“The world economic landscape is undergoing some profound changes. As China becomes bigger and more powerful, it will challenge the value system established by the West. Printing money for other countries is an important step,” he said.
“Currency is a symbol of a country’s sovereignty. This business helps build trust and even monetary alliances.”
Beijing has regarded money printing capability as being as crucial as its atomic bomb programme to its national security amid fears its enemies could use fake notes to disrupt the economy.
The international money printing market has been dominated by Western companies for more than a century and some governments outsource printing to several different companies.
De La Rue, for example, has more than 140 countries as clients, according to information on its website.
Other major players include Giesecke & Devrient in Germany, which serves about 60 nations, and Crane Currency, based in the United States and with more than 200 years in the trade.
The main drawback of having money printed outside the country is the security risk.
Seven years ago, during the downfall of Muammar Gaddafi in Libya, the British government seized nearly US$1.5 billion worth of dinars printed by De La Rue, causing serious cash shortages that increased the pressure on the regime.
De La Rue did not respond to the Post’s queries.
Modern money printing facilities are also extremely sophisticated and expensive to operate and use technology beyond the reach of ordinary business to reduce the risk of replication.
Security features like embedded thread, metallic ribbon and colour-shifting ink require considerable licence fees; many countries cannot afford to print all the banknotes they need.
Zhongchao Special Security Technology, a subsidiary of China Banknote Printing and Minting Corporation, is now the world’s biggest supplier of security features for banknotes, according to De La Rue.
The British company’s most recent annual report said that the Chinese firm now has a third of the global market share, four times that of its own.
Sources in the industry say that one of its major advantages in this area is its ability to provide security features at a relatively low cost, compared with more technologically advanced Western rivals.
China is the only country that has the capacity to perform intaglio printing – “raised” printing simultaneously on both sides of a banknote. Chinese researchers also won an international innovation award in 2015 for ColorDance, a new holographic feature that can significantly increase a currency’s security for relatively little expense.
Britain impounded US$1.6 billion in Libyan dinars during the revolt against the Gaddafi regime.
But not everyone is optimistic about the future of money printing as cashless payments grow in popularity around the world.
“I won’t let my children work in this factory. Paper currency is doomed,” said an employee in the Kunshan facility.
According to the People’s Bank of China, only about 10 per cent of payments in retail sales were made in cash in 2016 due to the prevalence of mobile phone payment methods.
The share may be even lower now, but the central bank did not respond to requests for comment.
The number of people working in the Chinese money printing industry fell by more than 2,500 between 2013 and the end of last year, according to the central bank.
In the face of this, the factory worker said that China would face enormous challenges taking business from well-established Western printing companies.
“There is still a technological gap between us and the West. To fill the gap requires some talented young people. But now most PhDs under the age of 40 in our factory have left.
“With their knowledge and experience they have easily found jobs in private companies, which offer them much higher salaries and benefits,” said the employee.
“And we are state companies. We are crippled by inefficiency in competition against private companies.”
This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as: China cashes in as global money printing centre.
There's nothing remotely weird about this. Canada's mint also produces notes and coins for dozens of other countries. It's a highly specialized, low-margin, business so lots of countries outsource it to outside vendors. In this circumstance, it just happens that the outside vendors are often governments and/or government owned/run corporations.
reply
Yeah New Zealand's money is printed in Canada. Circulating cash and notes is an issue, but not nearly as much of an issue as the "digital" printing that happens via the central banks (Reserve Bank of New Zealand, in my case).
I want to believe that there would be a bit of oversight and process here for coin & note printing from a State-Owned Enterprise such as in the article, what benefit does China have in being caught printing low-value coins and notes on the side? If they get caught it would be a major loss of face.
Bigger issues would be technology leaks: printers and plates being "lost", etc.
reply
Would love to see a free market for minting coin and notes. i think
reply
Disclaimer: Didn't read the full post. I just searched for "war" and didn't found a mention so I thought this wasn't mentioned yet in the post.
Money counterfeiting by governments can also be a strategy during wartime:
Operation Bernhard was an exercise by Nazi Germany to forge British bank notes. The initial plan was to drop the notes over Britain to bring about a collapse of the British economy during the Second World War.
If North Korea really was behind the superdollars, it certainly wouldn’t be the first time a world power has used forged currency to damage an opponent. In fact, for more than 200 years, counterfeiting has been a part of the wartime strategies of a number of countries. According to one source, during the Seven Years War both the Austrian and Russian armies dispersed bogus Polish money while on campaign as a means to further weaken the enemy. It was a strategy revived by Napoleon when he wanted to undermine the economies of Austria, Russia and Great Britain.
reply
This was my first thought.
I don't know whether it would be filed under baseless and unwarranted today. Still, to myself, something seems inherently wrong with outsourcing minting of coins and bills. I would've expected Thailand as a nation steeped in it's own heritage and still a monarchy to this day might find resources to employ and innovate locally.
reply
These are similar to the scenarios in my mind.
reply
I think there's a company that prints physical currency for multiple countries like Vietnam and Australia. They look similar as in they have a watermark and holograms etc.
reply
This is called "outsourcing" and is not weird in the least. The issuer (and the one responsible for controlling the supply) is still the original country, not the one doing the printing.
I imagine you could outsource to a private printing firm, and I'm sure it happens out there somewhere.
Not to mention that the amount printed physically is an insignificant amount compared to the absolute torrent of debt in a central bank's digital books.
reply
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.