pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @wassersnaus 30 Dec 2023
why use this over bisq or robosats?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Line2Wire 30 Dec 2023
I don't think this a very helpful comment given the context.
If we were comparing something like CEXs, then yeah, sure
However, more DEXs is never a bad thing, regardless of feature parity.
From a very quick overview, it seems like a nice, mobile, DEX UX. Bisq is desktop only and Robosats is HTML. I'm not aware of other mobile DEXs to compare it to.
Closest on mobile would be Robosats as a PWA.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @wassersnaus 31 Dec 2023 freebie
I was not arguing peach is a bad thing, I was asking why someone would use this over bisq/robosats. I get that a mobile UI is compelling for normies but aside from that I have not found anything that makes the product better than the alternatives for me. Thats ok, but I am not making the switch based on «muh swiss privacy» which is not what it was. I am all for competition in the space and more actors is generally a good thing, but I dont understand how a company beeing behind trades gives it any significant advantage, and I dont know how introducing a mechanism designed to increase trust in traders is pushing the bitcoin ethos and if its a good idea. To trust that the company is competent, and to trust this traders reputation seems like a sub optimal solution imho. Having a database over all your trades in the possession of a company that can be subpeonad is something that should be taken into account. its also region locked to EU which again is a huge negative for me. Personally I want to rely on the most robust solutions for my finacial infrastructure and peach seems to not make the cut.