@anon
sign up
@anon
sign up
The Lightning Network Whitepaper Is Eight Years Old Today
825 sats
\
14 comments
\
@0xbitcoiner
14 Jan
lightning
🥂🎉🎊🎆🎈
https://lightning.network/lightning-network-paper.pdf
write
preview
reply
100 sats
related posts
view all related items
615 sats
hot
recent
top
113 sats
\
0 replies
\
@satoshiplanet
14 Jan
happy lightning, stackers!
reply
113 sats
\
1 reply
\
@hasherstacker
14 Jan
reply
71 sats
\
0 replies
\
@0xbitcoiner
OP
14 Jan
reply
92 sats
\
1 reply
\
@0xbitcoiner
OP
14 Jan
reply
0 sats
\
0 replies
\
@cyberpunk02
15 Jan
earth discharge!
reply
21 sats
\
0 replies
\
@0xbitcoiner
OP
15 Jan
The Lightning Network Whitepaper Did NOT Turn Eight Yesterday
=>
#388556
thanks
@kristapsk
reply
21 sats
\
1 reply
\
@yfaming
15 Jan
It takes time for great ideas to spread and conquer. I didn't take it seriously until 8 years passed. 😂
reply
0 sats
\
0 replies
\
@0xbitcoiner
OP
15 Jan
the best is yet to come ⚡️
reply
21 sats
\
0 replies
\
@BlokchainB
15 Jan
HBD LN ZAP ⚡️
reply
121 sats
\
1 reply
\
@kristapsk
15 Jan
No, it isn't, there was earlier public draft release (0.5) in February 2015.
https://web.archive.org/web/20150301065655/http://lightning.network/lightning-network-paper-draft-0.5.pdf
reply
0 sats
\
0 replies
\
@0xbitcoiner
OP
15 Jan
Do you know why they no longer mention this version on the official website?
reply
21 sats
\
0 replies
\
@riberet19
15 Jan
God bless lightning network, its developers and stacker news too!
reply
0 sats
\
1 reply
\
@ca
15 Jan
Technological dead end?
It's been 8 years...
https://x.com/privacymatter21/status/1746435747547373613?s=20
reply
21 sats
\
0 replies
\
@kristapsk
15 Jan
Argument there is bad - he would pay more or less the same fee for just onchain Bitcoin transaction, without Lightning. But now he has bigger channel he can use to spend cheaply.
reply
The Lightning Network Whitepaper Did NOT Turn Eight Yesterday