Curious at what level the fee to post would stop stackers from posting.
10 sats4.0%
50 sats10.0%
100 sats22.0%
1000 sats64.0%
50 votes \ poll ended
2 replies \ @OriginalSize 13 Feb
By the results it seems there's room for 5k and 10k options.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby OP 13 Feb
Yes. I should have had some higher options.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @joyepzion 13 Feb
1 Million, 10 Million and 100 Million sats should have been an option
reply
144 sats \ 0 replies \ @Car 12 Feb
For territories 1k makes the most sense rn tbh maybe goes higher or lower over time.
How I am thinking through it, is the possible engagement and conversation you are hoping to get by posting in a particular territory.
Kind of what @k00b did in the early days, target for a specific niche ~bitcoin, for us at ~builders I am hoping to create that type of culture there, niching down.
Will see testing for at least this month.
Also were accepting monthly sponsorships via pin def reach out if interested. Willing to start that at 25K.
reply
115 sats \ 0 replies \ @030e0dca83 13 Feb
Depends how many sats I have and how strong I want to post. In my case the most expensive post was 100 sats, the most expensive zap 1000 sats so far
Maybe in the future even 1 sat will be too much...
reply
115 sats \ 0 replies \ @Roll 12 Feb
it s depend of the day, week, month and year.
and
It also depends of the inflation, war, bank tax, if i ve a job, if i m single, if i m young, if i m old.......
So it s though a question.
May be, the max will be 50 sats with the condition of giving of a reward back to those who deserves (interest of the article, how is writing, to do some promotion.....)
reply
205 sats \ 1 reply \ @satoshiplanet 12 Feb
100,000
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby OP 12 Feb
I admire your spirit, sir!
reply
102 sats \ 5 replies \ @Tef 13 Feb
I can't afford posting fees that go higher than 100 sats. So, I voted for the last option.
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @joda 16 Feb
why?
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Tef 16 Feb
Because I'm a beginner in the Bitcoin journey and my Bitcoin budget is limited right now! Hope this will change in the future.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @joda 16 Feb
but you said you voted for the last option, which is 1000 sats
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @Tef 16 Feb
Because the question was:
And I voted the 1000 will stop me posting.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @joda 16 Feb
Oh got it
reply
99 sats \ 2 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 12 Feb
Anything under 1000 is a no brainer for me. Since I don't make posts that often, they're usually something I have spent more than 5 seconds crafting.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby OP 12 Feb
Exactly. If the territories weren't already struggling for traffic, I'd say raise the posting price to 1000 and see what happens.
On the other hand, I wonder how SN would change if the SN territories cost 1000 to post and all the territories were cheaper.
reply
99 sats \ 0 replies \ @Car 13 Feb
People boost 5K sats on fountain.
reply
99 sats \ 1 reply \ @nkmg1c_ventures 12 Feb
The cost to post is what people are willing to pay, and tbh it's not high enough.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby OP 12 Feb
I've wondered the same and that was part of my thinking in asking people. I think I would probably post about the same amount if it was 100.
reply
99 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 12 Feb
What the market will bear. Its different for many of us. 100 sounds like a top for me buy I'm a single data point.
reply
99 sats \ 6 replies \ @kr 12 Feb
it’s a tough question because as post costs go up, so does the daily rewards pool… which might counteract the effect of making people less likely to post.
it’s something SN has experimented with, and will experiment more with over time. learning from the results of territory owners is actually a form of mass-experimentation.
reply
99 sats \ 4 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 12 Feb
Why not make the price per post a minimum instead of fixed?
reply
11 sats \ 3 replies \ @Scoresby OP 12 Feb
It might just be a UX thing: I think it would be a little annoying to type in how much I wanted to post instead of just tapping a button.
reply
144 sats \ 2 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 12 Feb
this
https://m.stacker.news/15989
edit: default value = minimum cost
reply
42 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby OP 12 Feb
Do you see this replacing boosts?
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 12 Feb
Mini boost ! Yeee ... It could be a boost or just someone willing to pay more than the minimum.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby OP 12 Feb
Yes. It has been interesting to see where different territory operators put there posting fees. But it's a little messy because they are topical and that means a second variable.
reply
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 12 Feb
128 SATS
reply
30 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 12 Feb
Even my low effort posts always bring in more than 100 sats. The 420 sats at ~mostly_harmless makes me think twice, but doesn't necessarily stop me.
reply
28 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby OP 12 Feb
Yeah, I should have added a 500 sat option.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 12 Feb
I still would have selected 1000.
reply
83 sats \ 0 replies \ @riberet19 13 Feb
For me it's much more than 50k sats
reply
81 sats \ 0 replies \ @joyepzion 13 Feb
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @SaToSHiWoMaN 13 Feb outlawed
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.
123 sats \ 1 reply \ @Eobard 12 Feb
deleted by author
reply
33 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby OP 12 Feb
I didn't realize ~meta cost 100 sats until I made this poll. Gave me pause for about five seconds.
reply