Increasing Number of Canadian Homeowners Offside \ stacker news ~econ

Increasing Number of Canadian Homeowners Offside

1554 sats \ 16 comments \ @grayruby 5 Mar econ

In Canada we know hockey, and in hockey being offside means you have crossed the defending team's blueline before the puck. Being offside is a quick way to end a goal scoring opportunity and keep your team on the outside (of the zone) looking in.

Unfortunately, a large and increasing number of Canadian homeowners are finding themselves offside on their mortgages. Mortgage delinquencies were up 50% last year compared to the prior year and the expensive housing markets of British Columbia and Ontario have seen 135.2% and 62% rises respectively in delinquencies from pre-pandemic levels.

There has also been an notable increase in homeowners filing for bankruptcy coinciding with the rise in delinquencies.

That's pretty much the TLDR version but if you want to read more, here is a link to the article I got the data from https://financialpost.com/news/mortgage-delinquency-rates-ontario-british-columbia-soar

Cheers, GR

view all related items

119 sats \ 14 replies \ @Undisciplined 5 Mar

Is this primarily from people losing their jobs or not being able to keep up with inflation?

370 sats \ 13 replies \ @grayruby OP 5 Mar

I don't think so. I think it relates to people over leveraging themselves to buy houses they couldn't afford when they could get mortgage rates at 2% and now have to renew at 6%. Most mortgages in Canada are 5 year term. They are ammortized over 25 or 30 years but mortgage term is only 5 years so when you go to renew after 5 years and rates have gone up you could see significant increases in your monthly payment. I renewed my mortgage last September and the payment went up about $300 a month. I have a small mortgage compared to most people in Canada so some folks would be looking at huge jumps in monthly payments. Add that onto the cost of everything else going up over the past few years and the insane amount of debt Canadian consumers hold and it's a perfect storm for insolvency.

169 sats \ 12 replies \ @Undisciplined 5 Mar

I always forget that outside of the US mortgages tend to be adjustable rate, rather than fixed rate. That's an awful situation to be in.

We're sitting pretty on a big ass mortgage fixed at a historically low rate.

37 sats \ 10 replies \ @grayruby OP 5 Mar

You can still get a fixed rate mortgage with a 30 year ammortization period but the term will be 5 years. So the rate is only fixed for 5 years.

100 sats \ 2 replies \ @Bell_curve 5 Mar

I’m guessing Canada 🇨🇦 doesn’t have an agency like Fannie or Freddie. USA banks sell loans to other banks or Fannie or Freddie after 5 years or less

60 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 5 Mar

Fannie Mae balance sheet is laughable

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby OP 6 Mar

Correct

50 sats \ 6 replies \ @Undisciplined 5 Mar

As opposed to the rate adjusting in real time? That seems like such a crazy long-term contract to me. I assume they don't adjust the principle down when home prices fall, so you're just getting the downside of market swings.

37 sats \ 5 replies \ @grayruby OP 5 Mar

There are variable rate mortgages and fixed rate mortgages. Variable rates fluctuate quarterly or so based on current market rates. Fixed rate mortgages don't change until the end of the term so if you have a 5 year fixed rate mortgage you should have the same rate in year 5 as year 1. Then after 5 years you renew or pay off your mortgage but no one pays it off.

50 sats \ 4 replies \ @Undisciplined 5 Mar

Just another reason to not live in Canada

58 sats \ 3 replies \ @grayruby OP 5 Mar

Here is a screenshot of a rate calculator I used to give you an idea what kind of variance in payments folks with larger mortgages could be looking at compared to when rates were much lower.

This is based off a 1M home in Toronto with a 200k down payment. Average home price in Toronto is around 1.2M so this would actually be a smaller mortgage than what a lot of people have.

https://m.stacker.news/19000

If you do not put at least 20% down you also need to buy mortgage insurance. If you put 100k down instead of 200k in this scenario you would pay around 30k in mortgage insurance.

view replies

50 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 5 Mar

Me too

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @amendt 6 Mar

We need to keep in mind that during the 2008 crisis it was only 2% of mortgages that went into default and it caused a cataclysm

https://m.stacker.news/19075