pull down to refresh

“The holy grail of cross-border payments is a solution allowing cross-border payments to be immediate, cheap, universal and settled in a secure settlement medium,” said the study, which was co-authored by Ulrich Bindseil, the ECB's director-general for market infrastructure and payments.
“Bitcoin is least credible” of the visions to achieve that, the report continued, and stablecoins – crypto assets that seek to tie their value to other assets such as fiat currencies – come in a close second given concerns over their market power.
The report says a bitcoin-based system wouldn’t work because of its “inherently inefficient” proof-of-work consensus mechanism, the “widespread” use for criminal purposes and the volatility of the asset. It also described the fervor of the cryptocurrency’s supporters as “quasi-religious.”
There’s more mileage in linking together individual jurisdictions’ central bank-issued digital currencies (CBDCs), Bindseil wrote. although few CBDCs exist yet.
Those developing CBDCs – presumably including the ECB, which is considering a digital euro – should “discuss at a relatively early stage the related interoperability issues” to ensure they can work together with other currency zones, the study said.
They should also try to make existing domestic instant-payment systems operate with each other, despite questions over how to vet dirty money, and deal with counterparties who might default, it added.
reply
For the ECB study, see the follow post, here on SN:
New European Central Bank Paper on Cross-Border Payments #53252 https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecb.wp2693~8d4e580438.en.pdf
reply
They can't envision you regaining control of your own money, you not having to comply with their KYC requirements, nyou ot obeying their sanctions, and you not providing the information needed to comply with "travel rule" requirements.
Bitcoin is almost the opposite of a CBDC.
reply
That's what I get for reading a review of the ECB report on CoinDesk rather than actually reading the ECB report.
CoinDesk totally cherry picked to fit their narrative.
reply
My busy life leaves me rely on summaries of these reports so Im sad to hear the points have been manipulated.
Did the report mention positives for BTC?
reply
Yes. There is another post, here on SN, which shares the report, and also has a comment reply that shares a Tweet from Alex Gladstein with the bitcoin-related stuff:
reply
Here is an archive. An archive has no paywall, no subscription requirement, and can be easier to read:
Bitcoin, Stablecoins the Worst Options for Cross-Border Payments, ECB Study Says https://archive.ph/I3bmj
reply
Apparently this central banker has not heard about Bitcoin's Lightning network, which does everything that they're describing (minus being a surveillance tool and money printer for them).
reply
Pfft, Bitcoin can't solve global payment woes because it doesn't have the ability to discriminate who the payer and payee is what I just read.
reply