pull down to refresh

When @cryotosensei posted about Shakespeare last month, I noted that great as reading the plays is, nothing beats experiencing them, since they were written to be performed, not read1.
Live performances have been the best. Sadly, by definition, they're the hardest to share with folks. I was lucky enough to live for a long time in areas with a lot of colleges and local indie theatre troupes, which in turn meant a lot of cheap and innovative takes on the Bard. I've seen a Twelfth Night set at a Woodstock-esque music festival, with Feste as a wandering pot dealer. I've seen Hamlet played by two actors at once, a man and a woman switching off lines and actions. I've seen another Hamlet where Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are also the heads of the Players. There was A Midsummer Night's Dream in a local park that drove home the play's setting. The Taming of the Shrew that somehow incorporated "Gangnam Style" into it. Etc. And, of course, there are tons of more "traditional" takes on all of the plays, each with their own variations.
But while stage versions are the best, movies and TV are easier to find. Some that I really recommend:
Much Ado About Nothing (1993). Arguably the best comedic adaptation. Branagh was at his best as a director here, and the cast is fantastic (with the exception of Keanu Reeves, though he's not nearly as bad as some folks claim). Every scene is a delight, and it's just an incredibly re-watchable film.
The 2012 version by Joss Whedon is also a blast (and often overlooked), with some surprisingly deep performances from the cast.
Hamlet (1990). Mel Gibson started to phone in his acting performances in the late '90s, but this was before then, and while a lot of folks went in with a "oh, this is an mis-cast action star" attitude, that was, frankly, bullshit. He'd already demonstrate acting ability, and Franco Zeffirelli got a great performance out of him and the rest of the cast. Yes, Glenn Close is barely older than Gibson and playing his mother, but she's too damned good to even really mind that. Hamlet's always better on stage than screen, but this is the best version I've seen on the latter.
Romeo and Juliet (1968) and The Taming of the Shrew (1967). Okay, if it's Franco Zeffirelli, you should see it. Full-stop. Having Liz Taylor and Richard Burton in Shrew was arguably stunt casting, but it works.
(Aside: I don't love Baz Luhrman's Romeo + Juliet, but I do think it's worth a viewing, and the acting is fantastic.)
Henry V (1989). Branagh, like Zeffirelli, is always worth seeing (and there are more than just the two I list), but this was what put him on the map. Shakespeare's histories don't always hit as hard as his other plays, but this is a fantastic play adapted wonderfully.
Richard III (1995). This is the other one of Shakespeare's histories that tends to get seen a lot, at times closer to a Macbeth-style tragedy (though with more dastardly villainy). You've heard Richard's opening and closing lines ("Now is the winter of our discontent" and "A horse, a horse, my kingdom for a horse!") out of context a million times, but everything in between is fantastic. This is one of the few films that really takes a serious risk in changing the setting, but Richard Loncraine gets fantastic performances from Ian McKellen, Annette Benning, and the rest of the amazing cast.
Titus (1999). Julie Taymor's adaptation of Titus Andronicus (an incredibly brutal play, almost grand guignol in nature) is riveting and disturbing, at times closer to a horror movie than a proper tragedy (though I'm not sure any story in Shakespeare is as tragic as Lavinia's). Not for everyone, but I adore this movie, and the performances of Anthony Hopkins, Alan Cummings, Harry Lennix, and Jessica Lange.
Note that there's not a single Olivier movie listed here (other than his vocal cameo in Zeffirelli's R+J). I think Olivier was a great actor, but his Shakespeare performances seem to epitomize how not to adapt something to film. They feel painfully like filmed versions of stage plays, without the energy that a live performance brings. I can appreciate the soliloquies on YT, but can't enjoy the entire experience.
There are also a TON of great films that are inspired by Shakespeare. A few that I love:
Throne of Blood 10 Things I Hate About You Kiss Me Kate Rosenkrantz and Guildenstern are Dead Ran West Side Story My Own Private Idaho Scotland, PA Forbidden Planet
I'm also a huge fan of the Canadian TV show Slings and Arrows, which follows a festival (modeled on the Stratford Festival) as it puts on performances of Hamlet, Macbeth, and King Lear. Absolutely some of the best TV ever made. The BBC also did a series called ShakespeaRe-Told that had some fascinating updates and takes (and a great cast).
I'm sure other folks have recommendations I'm either forgetting or have never seen (or even heard of). Let me know some fantastic ones to keep an eye out for, or nifty local productions you've seen.

Footnotes

  1. Shakespeare famously barely used stage directions, other than noting characters entering and exiting the stage. And with the exception of the famous "Exit Pursued by a Bear" line, few are even interesting. Compare this to A Streetcar Named Desire, which begins with a Hart Crane epigraph followed by three full paragraphs plus a bonus setting the scene, followed in turn by a paragraph bringing Mitch and Stanley onto the stage and describing them. Tennessee Williams assumed someone would read his play, even if they never saw it on stage or screen. To be clear, Streetcar is a masterpiece; this just demonstrates the different approaches.
44 sats \ 1 reply \ @freetx 12 Jun
Live performances have been the best. Sadly, by definition, they're the hardest to share with folks. I was lucky enough to live for a long time in areas with a lot of colleges and local indie theatre troupes, which in turn meant a lot of cheap and innovative takes on the Bard.
I was lucky enough to be in London in 2013 and got a chance to see this very good interpretation of As You Like It. It did a great job of remaining true-to-form but blending newish elements (modern clothes, cigarette smoking, etc).
Luckily being Royal Shakespeare Company they have a clip on YT.
(Setup for this scene, Orlando is in love with Rosalind....in this scene Rosalind disguises herself as another boy to sneak out how he really feels about her)
reply
Genuinely jealous -- seeing the RSC live is just a unique experience.
reply
Have you ever read Ovid's Metamorphoses? It was Shakespeare's favorite book. He references it multiple times throughout his plays; in one comedy (Cymbeline) the heroine stays up late studying it - which is so hilarious and cute, Shakespeare writes a heroine who studies his favorite author.
Anyway, the story of Philomel is the origin of Lavinia's tragedy. Philomel specifically was often mentioned by Shakespeare; the story, like, plagued him.
reply
I have read Ovid, and love it (though admittedly I read it in English translation). And love its influence on Shakespeare as well.
reply
Well, how many of us can read Latin these days?
reply
Shakespeare is most widely read around the globe. He is also most widely performed and adapted on screen. It's not only Hollywood that has been making films on him but I've come accross many films in my native language as well.
But for me, reading his dramas has been most helpful to understand the real meaning that his writings infer. When they say, they were written to perform on stage — I agree but I can't be fully satisfied until I read the same play.
reply
I absolutely love reading them (and there are some I've still only read, since performances of, say, Henry VI Part 3 are rare)! But I've found that after reading them, seeing and hearing the dialogue imbues extra meaning.
I'd love to know some great performances you've seen in your native language; a couple of the ones I mention (Ran and Throne of Blood) aren't in English, but most of my Shakespeare experience is in English, and I'd love to expand that.
reply
Yes, I agree. By watching or hearing these plays, you can infer some extra meaning. I just believe that reading them is essential.
I've watched all 4 of the great tragedies, Romeo and Juliet, Antony and Cleopatra, Julius Caesar, A Midsummer's Night Dream, Twelfth Night, Tempest and one or two more I can't remember the names. Most of them I watched in Hindi but Hamlet and Romeo and Juliet are two that I've also watched in English. While teaching in a college, I also got a chance to direct Hamlet.
reply
Thank you for this! This came at the right time. I was thinking that I should read more Shakespeare soon. After I finish reading “The Myths of Happiness”.
What I adore about this article is how you evidently try to be comprehensive, casting the net as wide as you can, wholeheartedly endorsing some while politely declining others. Makes me eager to watch some of these n form my own opinion!
Bookmarked
reply
Thank you! I did try to be pretty thorough (which meant this took a lot longer than I'd originally expected). I still left some out to try to keep things (somewhat) focused, and probably forgot even more. Looking forward to hearing about your further reading and viewing!
reply
Have you seen the Romeo and Juliet with Dicaprio? That one is fun!
reply
I have -- that's the Baz Luhrman version!
reply
I remember watching it in high school. Their swords were cute.
reply