A new study by Sinolytics, commissioned by the German Engineering Federation (VDMA), reveals that European companies are increasingly losing ground to Chinese competitors. With Chinese products becoming both better and cheaper, 61% of the surveyed 500 European firms expect their competitive position to worsen within five years, a sharp rise from the current 37%.
Chinese manufacturers are not only improving in quality but are also supported by extensive subsidies, giving them a significant edge. The VDMA urges European policymakers to protect the EU market from these competitive imbalances while adhering to WTO rules. To stay competitive, European firms need to innovate and rethink their product strategies.
VDMA President Karl Haeusgen highlights China's aggressive international expansion driven by high-quality, technologically advanced, and cost-effective products. This trend is further accelerated by declining domestic demand in China, prompting firms to seek new markets. China's expansive free trade policies now benefit 21 countries, offering favorable trade and investment conditions.
From this growth, China will revive it's real estate!
reply
China has clearly entered a period of lower growth after dynamic decades. demographics will do the rest and shift the potential path downwards.
reply
That is totally true, the EU must do something and quickly in the short term... since Asian products are making great progress... in addition to the fact that they have the advantage due to the majority of subsidies... the truth is I think that they do not take action In the matter, their economies are going to continue to decline...
reply
Chinese products: better and cheaper EU: We can't allow that for our slaves citizens!
reply
Lol
reply
"The VDMA urges European policymakers to protect the EU market from these competitive imbalances while adhering to WTO rules." this is how you know Western globalization-driven "free market" advocacy was never that. It was "as long as I win, get out the way. Once I start to lose, PROTECT ME"
reply
Exactly. Neo-mercantilistic cowards
reply
deleted by author
reply