pull down to refresh

Under a Constitutional system no private banks would exist to rob the people. Government banks under the control of the people's representatives would issue and control all money and credit. They would issue not only actual currency, but could lend limited credit at no interest for the purchase of capital goods, such as homes. A $60,000 loan would require only $60,000 repayment, not $255,931 as it is now. Everyone who supplied materials and labor for the home would get paid just as they do today, but the Bankers would NOT get $195,931 in usury. AND THAT IS WHY THEY RIDICULE AND DESTROY ANYONE SUGGESTING GOVERNMENT (CITIZENS') MONEY WITHOUT INTEREST AND WITHOUT DEBT.
History tells us of debt-free and interest-free money issued by governments. The American colonies did it in the 1700's and their wealth soon rivaled England and brought restrictions from Parliament, which led to the Revolutionary War. Abraham Lincoln did it in 1863 to help finance the Civil War. He was later assassinated by an agent of the Rothschild Bank. No debt-free or interest-free money has been issued in America since then. Several Arab nations issue interest-free loans to their citizens today. The Saracen Empire for bad interest on money for 1,000 years, and its wealth outshone even Saxon Europe. Mandarin China issued its own money, interest-free and debt-free, and historians and collectors of art today consider those centuries to be China's time of greatest wealth, culture, and peace.
Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 and on, accounting for its startling rise from the depression to a world power in 5 years. Germany finance its entire government and war operation from 1935 to 1945 without gold and without debt, and it took the whole Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German power over Europe and bring Europe back under the heel of the bankers. Such history of money does not even appear in the textbooks of public (government) schools today.
Issuing money which doesn't have to be paid back in interest leaves the money available to use in the exchange of goods and services, and its only continuing cost is replacement as the paper wears out. Money is the paper ticket by which such transfers are made and should always be in sufficient quantity to transfer all possible production of the nation to ultimate consumers.
It is as ridiculous for a nation to say to its citizens, “You must consume less because we are short of money,” as it would be for an airline to say “Our planes are flying, but we can't take you because we are short of tickets.”
🇳​​​​​🇪​​​​​🇽​​​​​🇹​​​​​ #620989 Stable Money
reply
🇵​​​​​🇷​​​​​🇪​​​​​🇻​​​​​🇮​​​​​🇴​​​​​🇺​​​​​🇸​​​​ #620542 THE CONSTITUTIONAL WAY
reply
This is a chapter of the book

Billions for Bankers & Debts for the People

The Real Story of the Money-Control Over America - by Pastor Sheldon Emry
Give it a read! Start from the...
🇮​​​​​🇳​​​​​🇩​​​​​🇪​​​​​🇽​​​​​​​​​​ #622479
reply
Why would anyone lend money then? What is the incentive? Where would the government get money to lend? Steal from the people?
reply
I smell fiat mindset around...
Why would anyone lend money then? What is the incentive?
Maybe I'm too naive... what about doing it for the common good? It's worth to consider, if thou are able to afford 10% for “investment” and willing to lose it, why not place 0.1% for those in need? it would be a nice karma upgrade!
Where would the government get money to lend? Steal from the people?
That's what Govs are currently doing, or am I wrong?
reply
Yes…isn’t that what’s wrong with the world? Rampant theft by the government via taxes and inflation?
YOU are stuck in a fiat paradigm. It’s fine to be charitable, but government isn’t required nor is it desirable.
People can do what they want, but 0 interest loans don’t make any sense using real money. “For the greater good” is Marxist poison and has killed 100 million people and counting….no thank you. The individual is the only entity that can have freedom, the only thing that can possess rights is an individual person, not a collective.
reply
You maybe right, I’m stuck in a fiat mindset, like the majority I assume. I also assume that a fiat, capitalistic mindset could be applied to Bitcoin. I agree in the fact that we don't need a government and everyone should be responsible for her/himself and her/his actions. Capitalistic wars kill millions of people too, interests and conquest of what we want to believe it’s ours. Do we really own things, or are indeed just the temporary carers of whatever will be around for longer than our existence. I’m trying to look at things outside these constrains and just wonder how we can contribute to a world where property it’s just another belief of the past. If we took and use just what we need to live a fulfilling life to share the experience each one of us live, it will probably be a better world. But since we always prioritise our ego, avarice and contempt… well, that’s what we are experiencing since few millennia look’s like. In the other side, this is the result of millennia of evolution, so let’s assume it’s the best we could have done for now based on common knowledge we have.
reply