@anon
sign up
@anon
sign up
pull down to refresh
Additional context for "DoS due to inv-to-send sets growing too large"
x.com/0xB10C/status/1844705899455062220
349 sats
\
3 comments
\
@0xB10C
11 Oct 2024
bitcoin
related
Dissection of a force-close that already cost me 140k sats
10.2k sats
\
21 comments
\
@C_Otto
31 Dec 2023
lightning
freebie
PR closed: datacarriersize: Match more datacarrying by luke-jr
github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28408
2997 sats
\
14 comments
\
@niftynei
9 Jan 2024
bitdevs
Why happen force closures on LN channels?
14.7k sats
\
18 comments
\
@DarthCoin
23 Aug 2024
bitcoin
[Lightning-dev] Disclosure: Fake channel DoS vector
lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2023-August/004064.html
1663 sats
\
1 comment
\
@Rsync25
24 Aug 2023
bitcoin
Tor now has a PoW based DoS mitigation feature in v0.4.8.1a with new algo Equi-X
forum.torproject.net/t/alpha-release-0-4-8-1-alpha/7816
2281 sats
\
6 comments
\
@janowitz
5 Jun 2023
bitcoin
[bitcoin-dev] Full Disclosure: CVE-2023-40231 / CVE-2023-40232 / CVE-2023-40233
lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2023-October/021999.html
3804 sats
\
13 comments
\
@Rsync25
16 Oct 2023
bitcoin
I2P is experiencing a Denial-of-Service attack
teddit.net/r/i2p/comments/10v9uxp
855 sats
\
8 comments
\
@cryptocoin
7 Feb 2023
bitcoin
The testnet mempool is full.
2032 sats
\
19 comments
\
@lloyddunne
14 Apr 2024
Ordinals_Inscriptions_Runes
MAD Transactions: Mutual Assured Destruction Transactions
medium.com/@idBrain/mad-transactions-mutual-assured-destruction-transactions-c04f7b5a2fa7
1909 sats
\
6 comments
\
@fiatjaf
3 Jan 2023
bitcoin
Niklas Gögge on denial-of-service bugs in LND
brink.dev/blog/2023/12/22/dos-bugs-lnd/
3597 sats
\
0 comments
\
@Rsync25
22 Dec 2023
bitcoin
DoS Disclosure: LND Onion Bomb
delvingbitcoin.org/t/dos-disclosure-lnd-onion-bomb/979
1878 sats
\
3 comments
\
@Rsync25
18 Jun 2024
lightning
freebie
[bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes Multiparty Protocols DoS More Expensive
lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2023-January/021322.html
703 sats
\
3 comments
\
@k00b
10 Jan 2023
bitcoin
Something else is burning blockspace and bloating the UTXO set 🧵
nitter.at/mononautical/status/1621663167582437376
2431 sats
\
9 comments
\
@cryptocoin
4 Feb 2023
bitcoin
"Size Limits are Now the Only Reason that Bitcoin doesn't have Covenants"
1579 sats
\
2 comments
\
@nerd2ninja
8 May 2024
bitcoin
freebie
Discussion about increasing default mempool size limit in Bitcoin Core
github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27079
568 sats
\
14 comments
\
@kristapsk
11 Feb 2023
bitcoin
remote bitcoin core killer?? OOM from bad peer conn msgs
x.com/123456/status/1741922597908959701
2630 sats
\
7 comments
\
@niftynei
6 Jan 2024
bitdevs
Force Closes with large timeout recovery tx fee
2578 sats
\
5 comments
\
@ZezzebbulTheMysterious
18 Oct 2024
lightning
Bitcoin Core: Disclosure of DoS due to inv-to-send sets growing too large
bitcoincore.org/en/2024/10/08/disclose-large-inv-to-send/
437 sats
\
0 comments
\
@0xB10C
11 Oct 2024
bitcoin
Will small UTXOs become a problem in a mempool-collapsed future?
1898 sats
\
36 comments
\
@pillar
30 Nov 2022
bitcoin
Isn't utxo set growth a big issue?
2097 sats
\
4 comments
\
@leaf
13 Apr 2024
bitcoin_beginners
Dynamic max_htlc_msat: Leaking Liquidity and Flow
2200 sats
\
4 comments
\
@zapomatic
29 Dec 2023
lightning
more