Yes, maybe. That's what I meant with "his zaps" in #928481:
Does he mean nobody can fake his zaps?
But that's not that useful. He can trust his own zaps (as a sender or receiver) as much as he wants, I don't care, every recipient can still fake them for me.
He also mentions it in the same sentence as "value signal":
It's a different value signal, it's something that you can't fake.
I want to give him the benefit of the doubt, but what he said there is clearly wrong.
Here's the video uploaded to SN for better UX:
important part starts at 13:40 with his claim "[zaps are] something that you can't fake" at 14:58
I think he means the if you’re the receiver and aren’t the sender, you know you received money.
Yes, maybe. That's what I meant with "his zaps" in #928481:
But that's not that useful. He can trust his own zaps (as a sender or receiver) as much as he wants, I don't care, every recipient can still fake them for me.
He also mentions it in the same sentence as "value signal":
I want to give him the benefit of the doubt, but what he said there is clearly wrong.
Someone replied on nostr with this:
https://njump.me/nevent1qyv8wumn8ghj7enfd36x2u3wdehhxarj9emkjmn99uq3zamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0qyd8wumn8ghj7ur4wfshv6tyvyhxummnw3ezumrpdejz7qg7waehxw309ahx7um5wgkhqatz9emk2mrvdaexgetj9ehx2ap0qyf8wumn8ghj7etev4ejue3h0ghxjme0qqsy4tzypa2vh3c5ymku0lgqpzvr5kma7qd4t5kkzvgsaywlckd8t6c0ccap6