pull down to refresh

Some quick, Econ 101 style analysis of tariffs. I'm sure this would get me laughed out of an academic seminar, but it might be helpful to think through the basics, step by step.
  1. Direct effect of tariffs on markets where we are currently net importers, (before retaliation)
    • Prices rise because it becomes more expensive to import cheaper goods from overseas
    • Domestic production expands because domestic producers face less international competition
    • The expansion of domestic production does not offset the loss of imports, since domestic producers are less efficient than international ones (which is why we imported in the first place)
    • Thus, overall consumption falls
    • Domestic producers benefit, domestic consumers hurt
  2. Effect of retaliatory tariffs on markets where we are currently net importers
    • Input costs rise because the entire supply chain will get more expensive (I'm assuming that we import much of the intermediate goods necessary for production--a good assumption overall)
    • Higher input costs translate to higher prices and reduced equilibrium production and consumption
    • Domestic producers and domestic consumers are both hurt by this
  3. Effect of retaliatory tariffs on markets where we are currently net exporters
    • International demand falls because of the retaliatory tariffs
    • Input costs rise because supply chain gets more expensive
    • Demand falling has downward price pressure; input costs rising has upward price pressure
    • Domestic production and consumption will both fall; effect on prices is ambiguous
    • Bad for domestic producers; could be good for domestic consumers if results in lower domestic prices (e.g. energy prices could lower if less of our energy is exported)
  4. If coupled with reduction in taxes
    • Reduction in taxes will increase both production and consumption
    • Consumers will face lower after-tax prices and producers will receive higher after-tax revenue
    • Good for both domestic consumers and domestic producers
So, what will the net effect be?
Now, start throwing the tomatoes
6th bullet on 1: Foreign producers hurt, foreign consumers benefit from lower prices.
I recall one of my trade professors saying that the expected welfare loss from going all the way to autarky is only about 3%. People can probably chill out. The sky isn't falling.
reply
the expected welfare loss from going all the way to autarky is only about 3%
Eh, that's almost certainly wrong...... right? right?
There are certain things we just don't have the natural or human capital to make on our own
reply
Are those things worth 3% of economic activity?
I'm also sure it's wrong, btw, but the basic point that America can get along perfectly well without unfettered free trade is probably correct. Most likely we wouldn't even be reduced to a European or Canadian standard of living and we aren't going anywhere near full autarky.
reply
61 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jer 9h
You keep my standard of living out of this, sir. 😂
reply
Yeah I agree that the panic isn't justified. Though I do think even if what you say is true, there will be a painful adjustment period.
reply
Yep. That's a prediction from general equilibrium models, which know nothing about the path to equilibrium.
reply
Trump mentioned the $36T US government debt mountain in his announcement and so it seems fair to say that reducing USAs chronic trade deficits and therefore accumulation of debt is a major factor and intention. The US has been living beyond its means for decades and at least Trump appears to acknowledge this. Currently US debt servicing is nearly $1T/year. The tariffs income could make a significant dent in this debt servicing. If US debt servicing cost is not reduced then the pretense of US financial system viability is likely to unravel very soon. By 2030 debt servicing and core government expenditure would be consuming all of government revenue- ie an embedded deficit and assured eventual if not imminent insolvency. However if Trump also enacts tax cuts they are likely to benefit the wealthy most and do not expect the wealthy to pass on those tax cuts to US consumers- there is no reason they would. So consumers will be the big losers- anyone who spends most of their income which is generally the lowest and middle income earners- the wealthy do not spend most of their income- and so they do not pay proportionately as much in the increased cost of consumer goods. It is a least well of Americans who will be hit hardest by the tariffs. The rest of the world will accelerate its growing trade dependence upon China as China will become even more important as a buyer of commodities and a supplier of manufactured goods. US consumers will face a 20-40% inflation bump on imported goods. The FED might say it will look over this 'temporary' inflation bump but it is not temporary- it is permanent - US consumers and businesses will face ~20-40% higher costs on imported goods than the rest of the world. Great way to handicap your entire economy in one more massively deranged Trumpian gesture. The only way these tariffs can be seen as rational is if you are expecting war in the near future and need to rebuild your domestic supply chains despite their inherent structural inefficiency.
reply