A lot has been written about the Rogan-Murray-Smith interview/debate already. On SN, see previous posts #943891 and #942073
This analysis stands out to me, which is why I'm sharing it again here. I found it was quite neutral, it avoids taking sides, but instead, focuses on two key points which I felt were underexplored, or not adequately discussed in the original conversation: the question of expertise—what is an expert?—and how to combat online misinformation.