pull down to refresh

As members of Congress intensify their demands for answers regarding classified information about UFOs held within the national security apparatus, the insights of veteran UFO researcher Dr. Jacques Vallee take on renewed significance. Vallee, a central figure in UFO research and debate for over six decades, offers a unique perspective.
Often diverging from mainstream UFO theories, Vallee was among the first to suggest that the unidentified craft observed throughout history might originate from realities beyond our own planet. He has witnessed countless calls for an end to official secrecy and has himself participated in clandestine investigations.
One such endeavor was a UFO study initiated by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) in 2008, operating discreetly within a Las Vegas aerospace company. A particularly concerning aspect of this DIA effort centered on the very real health consequences experienced by individuals who have encountered UFOs.
According to the subtitles, this DIA program documented hundreds of cases involving serious injuries. Investigators associated with this initiative even traveled to Brazil to access government files detailing hundreds of Brazilians who sought medical treatment for injuries allegedly sustained after encounters with UFOs.
While Dr. Vallee refrained from discussing specific files from this DIA study, he confirmed contributing cases to their database involving injuries he believes were not accidental.
“I can tell you that in my files, some of which I contributed to the database,” Vallee stated, “there are at least half a dozen well-documented cases where the injuries that resulted in death were deliberate incidents in which UFOs deliberately caused physical harm to humans.”
The hints indicate that while deliberate harm is considered rare by those who have reviewed the full files of this DIA program, it does occur.
Dr. Colm Kelleher, a former manager within this DIA effort, reportedly stated bluntly that “UFOs are bad for human health.” This raises questions about whether the potential for harm is a significant factor contributing to government secrecy.
reply