pull down to refresh

Resist the black pill. If the evolution of the "bitcoin community" bothers you, I'm with you. It's very likely that you need to shift your expectations but not your principles.
Lately, I've been hearing many bitcoiners and non-bitcoiners point out how the bitcoin world is embracing the suits—the politicians and traditional finance. This is on full display at Bitcoin 2025. I haven't watched the conference, but I have seen a few clips that seem to trigger people, and I get it. Believe me, I do. Please read this as kind advice for your own good.
We have many memes in the bitcoin space.
  • Bitcoin Fixes This
  • Not Your Keys Not Your Coins
  • Never Sell Your Bitcoin
  • HODL
There are many more. Memes are meant to compress a large amount of info into a small package. They work very well. But just because people repeat memes doesn't mean they understand the meaning and dense knowledge that caused them to develop. I think many bitcoiners, disappointed in the status quo, have miscalculated their fellow bitcoiners. After all, it is easy to repeat memes and seem like you are in the club. Many are not. Many do not share our values.

The Inevitability of Where We Are

I've been aware of bitcoin for a long time now. I didn't get it for many years. I didn't realize where it was coming from. As I started to understand how it was a technical application for many economic and technological things I already believed in, it started to come together. By this point in my life, though, I had already realized that most people are just going with the flow. They don't think deeply about the issues I care about. They are too practical. It took some time for me to realize that this doesn't make me superior to them, just different. I began to realize that these people matter, but it is a waste of time to try to convince them intellectually. Practical solutions are the only way. You see, most people do not even understand or care about how the current system works. They just want what they want for their families. Many are very good at it. They play the game. They don't wonder why the game was made or who made it. There are also many people that understand the issues with the system but simply want to use them to enrich themselves. They see what we see but don't care to change it as long as they can profit from it.
As bitcoin becomes more commonly used/bought/traded, it will move into these camps. The number of people that are hard-core bitcoiners is small. Very small. It's not going to become a significant portion of the population. Just as those that get economics aren't, nor are those that understand technology on a deep level. Don't get me wrong. It will grow, but it's never going to be the majority.
So with all this in mind, it is inevitable that a scarce money/asset would attract people that simply want to use it to make themselves wealthy. It's inevitable that bitcoin will become integrated into the financial system. The state will not be able to kill it, so it tries to use it. Is this good? Well, I don't think it is, but that doesn't really matter now, does it? Bitcoin doesn't care about what I think. Just as gold doesn't care how murderous and evil the man is that holds it.

Bitcoin Doesn't Fix This... Not Yet At Least

I'm beginning to think that many that are decrying the current state of bitcoin actually believed that "bitcoin fixes this." I mean, they believed it might do it overnight. I am having a hard time not thinking that many people actually think that when someone buys bitcoin, they have some sort of "born-again" experience. That's nonsense, and I doubt anyone would say this, but I think many might have believed it. Bitcoin, once it replaces the fiat system and revolutionizes banking, will fix many problems we see. The thing is, before fiat money printing, we still had many problems. The incentives that fiat money printing creates are not all the problems that exist. It just amplifies them. Bitcoin doesn't magically make people hate taxes and the state. We've had many years to win over those people to bitcoin, and frankly, we have a long way to go to even get those people. Maybe we should adjust our time preference.

The Vanguard

So what's my point? If you are triggered by all this bitcoin conference nonsense, all this statist boot-licking, I'm with you. It's pathetic. Bitcoin was started by cypherpunks. By people that opposed the state. But they aren't here now. You are. Also, while I'm on this point, I think we overstate the early bitcoiners. I think plenty of them thought bitcoin, if it succeeded, would become very valuable. It's baked into the design. Don't kid yourself. Fiat has no bottom, and bitcoin has no top. But it was more than that. So bitcoin needs to be sovereign and censorship-resistant. If you care about these things, live it. Run a node. Run a lightning node. Use open-source software stacks. Dump your MacBook Pro and use Linux. Support devs. Be an uncle Jim to your friends and family. Do the work. We are the vanguard, and we should be principled. That doesn't mean a vow of poverty, but it does mean spending bitcoin. You can spend and replace. There always needs to be people that push back on the normies. It's better to do this with actions over words.
Keep holding onto your values. Live them out. Values are literally what you value. And if you aren't doing things that align with your values, they really aren't your values. You are larping. Just don't lie to yourself most of all. Lies are like poison. Sometimes you have to be honest with where you are in the moment. Take stock and adjust your frame. What do you really value, and are you living it? If not, why not. Maybe you are lying to yourself. Maybe you just aren't aware. Take stock and adjust.
Let me ask you a question. If you are really disappointed by all the chearl-eading for the suits and government shills entering the bitcoin space how exactly did you think bitcoin becoming used more widely would go?
  • Did you think people would suddenly start valuing hard money?
  • Did you think people would just stop believing in political power systems?
  • Did you think suits would suddenly care about sovereignty?
  • Did you expect greed to lose to moral purity?
I'm not trying to pick any fights. I just never hear many principled bitcoiners outline how they think bitcoin becomes the standard money for the world.
There's a lot of "bitcoin fixes this" but little on what the middle stages look like.
My answer is I have no clue. But I can tell you I don't see people suddenly becoming skeptical of the existing system and open to bitcoin. Greed and the utility of it as a savings vehicle seems far more likely for the US. Those in more oppressed places likely value the peer to peer aspects of it more.
reply
Hey kepford. You said, "I just never hear many principled bitcoiners outline how they think bitcoin becomes the standard money for the world."
Well I'm sorry for that. Here's some principles for ya:
You give every person on earth a UBI =$1250/mo, $15,000/yr. You prorate/backrate(?) a one time genesis award based on the person's age: UBI * age, so a 20yo receives $30,000 and a 60yo receives $90,000, representing a person saving one month's income each year. Most people will accept this as a better deal than their current financial situation. You agree on a cap which is the maximum a single entity can horde, perhaps 1000 * UBI * yr = $15,000,000. If you need more then that, get married, need more, don't kick your kids out of the house. Your root key should be resettable, perhaps with the help of the escrow organizations of your choice, with some type of failsafe based on your SSN or biometrics, so there is no such thing as "not your keys". The system should be gamified using the Bitcoin app (aka nostr) to incentivize good behaviour according to community decisions (hopefully based on the state of the art of scientific consensus) made by small ad hoc local committees formed as needed by lottery (gov't by sortition), with unlimited appeal/review, until all objections have been addressed on public record. If you don't like your community's process, join or start a different one.
If you make the coin's base unit of value equal to some real-world definable object that everyone can/must agree upon by the nature of it's existential manifestation, i.e. it's describable attributes, then the system is less likely to suffer from Tulip Revolution failures. Base it on time, or work hours, or sunlight, or potatoes, or land area, or energy, or persons (how much is a person worth?) or merit or blurg. Personally I like potatoes, because then you can call them potato chits.
I'd love to discuss this more with you guys but I'll end here because my thumbs are getting tired and I'm still a Luddite when it comes to having AI speak for me.
reply
Hmm so this seems to me to have very little to do with bitcoin and more to do with a massive one world government able to do this. I'm left wondering why? Why bitcoin vs a central fiat coin like Tether.
UBI is really a nonstarter to me. I don't see this working any differently than welfare has in the past. But thanks for sharing. I just don't think UBI is needed and even if I thought it was it would fall apart.
I see people jumping into bitcoin gradually for years as fiat collapses and massively as it fails faster. Will be rough. I see it happening as part of a collapse most likely. It could happen differently. Who knows.
reply
"I just don't think UBI is needed and even if I thought it was it would fall apart."
If you couldn't afford a bed or a bicycle then would you think the same?
In order to consolidate our thoughts we need smart people to explore the possibilities and recommend best practices using public discussion, computer models/simulations and in-person role-playing with diverse participants chosen randomly. Stuff like that.
How could you say UBI is not needed? How could you decry welfare? Do you think poor people should not receive money created out of thin air, but big finance should continue to do so?
Cuz big finance is continuing to do so. But thanks to Satoshi we can do the same for all the world's poorest and we don't have to ask anyone permission to do it.
All your Bitcoins were created out of thin are and are merely arbitrary 1's and 0's we must have faith to believe in (can't see them). We can create a similar imaginary mental construct that benefits the poorest. We can. Bitcoin proves you can create imaginary money markets. Imagine world peace, please.
reply
To be clear. I hear where you are coming from... you seem to have care for those that need help. Don't assume that I'm opposed to helping people. I'm not. I do help people as a part of my life and have for years. There are many different schools of thought on how best to help people in need and UBI is one that think is deeply flawed and comes from an ideology that I have studied and found deeply flawed as well.
I don't assume you are evil or malicious because of this even though I find socialism to be an evil ideology. Don't assume those that are pro-freedom or pro free-market capitalist are evil greedy bastards either. These topics are things I have wrestled with, and debated in my own mind for decades. You might have done the same, I don't know.
reply
Poverty is the default state of man, but we have so much wealth in the west that we forget this. UBI is the opposite direction. Charity should not be systematized. Charity is required and if we don't appreciate that others need help from time to time and some will always need help then our civilization will crumble.
Do you think poor people should not receive money created out of thin air
No, I don't think people should receive money created out of thin air. But bitcoin is not money created out of thin air. By that statement it appears you do not understand what bitcoin is or how proof of work is. The state and banks create money out of thin air and that is one of the root issues in our society and the world. Energy is required to create bitcoins and this is a key aspect that makes it different from many shitcoins.
How could you say UBI is not needed? How could you decry welfare?
Some of my issues with UBI.
  1. I oppose theft and the use of force to redistribute wealth. This is what welfare and UBI is.
  2. I believe the state is the worst at helping people that need help and enabling people that are not helped by a hand out. This function is best done by communities, charities, and churches. Not the state.
  3. When the state does this function it robs the people of their connection with their communities. They resent how wealth is distributed and a portion of the population is taught to become helpless instead of becoming useful.
Its not because I don't think there is poverty in the world or even in my back yard. Those facts are WHY I'm opposed to UBI.
UBI is a socialist idea and has these root issues we have seen in socialism and social welfare done on a massive scale. Welfare has its place and on a hyper local level done in a voluntary way it is a beautiful thing.
I think we should just agree to disagree but it appears that bitcoin isn't really the topic here you are interested in but rather socialism.
reply
A lot of what's on display was always coming. No way around it. The only way is through.
Let's see how much of it sticks around through the next bear.
reply
Very good reflection! Enemies have been here for a long time, and it was inevitable that they would come; if we are sovereign with Bitcoin, it doesn't matter who may come.
reply
52 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 29 May
Yes sir! Keep that signal!
reply
I think it is important to mention that spending bitcoin means spending actual bitcoin. People can do whatever they please, obviously, but using auto-convert features to "spend" bitcoin doesn't support the network's growth by increasing the number of bitcoiners.
It might bring more speculative investors and therefore help ngu because the company providing the service will likely do very well. But it won't necessarily help the decentralization and other features that make bitcoin such a powerful technology favouring freedom. P2P value transfer does.
reply