64 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rex 7 Mar \ on: Brave wallet integrates Bitcoin support for its 60 million users bitcoin
Not integrating the Lightning Network does not make much sense. Due to security issues, it is unlikely that Bitcoin will be deposited into the Brave wallet.
If Lightning Network is integrated, other shitcoin wallets don’t need to exist.
You are assuming that the situation does not exist and that settlements between countries will not be settled using paper Bitcoin. Bitcoin is designed not to rely on third-party trust institutions to operate, because if there are third-party trust institutions, there will be institutions that fail. The failure of the third-party trust institution will cause the collapse of paper Bitcoin. Every paper Bitcoin crash that happens drives people back to the original Bitcoin system.
The average user cannot be sure that they are linking to a real website and not a fake one.Users cannot confirm whether they are offline. If it is a mobile phone, there will be more problems.Not many people know how to low-level format their computers.
Other than that, I don't trust bitaddress.org .
Make a tails OS usb stick. Use tails OS to open electrum and write seeds more easily.
Moreover, it is difficult to use Bitcoin with a simple paper wallet. Do you just think that everyone can add value to Bitcoin without using Bitcoin? Eventually you'll have to enter your private key into electrum, so why not just use electrum from the start.
There are not many softwares that support private key sweeping.
The risk has nothing to do with BIP39.
But using a web page to generate a private key is more dangerous.
As long as I can see your privacy at any time, then the concept of you being able to wear clothes is allowed.
Looking forward to the bull run after Bitcoin’s halving, fees will eventually be high enough to kill ordinals. Ultimately it comes down to how much you are willing to spend to move 546 stats.
Innocent people were defrauded and bought a bunch of useless stuff. Naturally, this can be said to be some kind of DDoS, and the innocent people are paying the bills.
Innocent people have malware in their brains.
Ordinals / BRC-20 / Inscriptions Scams rely on Bitcoin, they will not fork Bitcoin, as that would immediately make the scam worthless.
Money is a perception of value, without any entity. Concrete performance is a kind of IOU. Asking people to believe that you can store value in some kind of entity or encrypted text is inherently religious.
Is it important that you buy a cup of coffee to let people know?
The point is not whether it is important or not, the point is that privacy is a basic human right.
Privacy is not anonymity. The way to be anonymous in the cell phone age is to not use the cell phone.
But using a phone can still maintain privacy, depending on how you do it.
They have a signed NDA, so only limited open source. This might just be a marketing gimmick, don't be fooled.
A high enough fee is enough to eliminate BRC-20. I think this is the price that must be paid. It has maintained a high fee for a period of time to prove that BRC-20 is not feasible. After the speculative fanatics lose money, bitcoin will naturally return to normal .
I think this is an attack. With the withdrawal of large amounts of Bitcoin, Binance needs to organize the wallet at this time of high handling fees and aggregate small amounts into large amounts. This will inevitably require paying sky-high handling fees. This should be a coordinated attack, a multi-layered and delicate attack.
New technology is different from old knowledge and must be carefully understood rather than compared with old thinking, otherwise it is easy to make big mistakes. A Bitcoin hardware wallet is not a wallet, it is just a signature tool that prevents private keys from leaking to the Internet.