pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Rsync25 OP 6h \ parent \ on: deleted by author bitcoin_beginners
Ok. I haven't freedom.
Thanks for let me know.
If you prove Lightspark is bad with SEC documents and ToS. I’ll stop post about them. And our fight ends.
I do not attack you.
Ok
I warn you about the trash you post (especially in a territory for noobs)
So I haven't freedom for post things, right?
Seems that YOU are not acting like a bitcoiner and continue posting about an enemy of bitcoin.
And you keep attacking me all the time as if you were the savior of the Universe.
That's not a good thing either.
OK, if you do not understand the point of trying to cleanup a bit your feed, removing the trash, then I will post also as a response the warning who is Lightspark.
LMAO. I understand your point. But attacking people for simply posting something you don't agree with seems like something a dictator would do, not a Bitcoiner.
Why I can't post nothing about them and you can post about others wallet? It is fair? We're in a "free" market or monopoly?
Again this shill for the crap Lightspark ?
Lol. The article is a interesting question. You keep being ignorant about good content independent of to be Lightspark or no.
Of course, he not will change treasury issuance and policy. But exist clear, conflict of interest. People are very blinded, unfortunately.
Lutnick is a supporter of cryptocurrency, and his company is a long-term partner of the Tether (USDT), helping to manage USDT's U.S. Treasury reserves.
Yep! Regulation will target big Lightning companies. Some people are very innocent about what’s coming