pull down to refresh
@chaoticalHeavy
129,436 sats stacked
stacking since: #108260longest cowboy streak: 59npub1g8g2w...c5fqmmk7um
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @chaoticalHeavy 14h \ on: @jamalderrick's bio
The Holy Son of God is welcome here.
I think TaiChi would be good for most people because the focus is on balance and lack of effort.
That makes people more confident because they know they can shift their balance as needed.
Here's what the Google AI output:
A post-immortality society refers to a future where humans have found ways to extend life significantly or achieve immortality, leading to profound changes in social structures, resource management, and cultural practices. This concept explores how humanity might adapt to the challenges and implications of living indefinitely, including issues related to population growth, resource scarcity, and the spiritual or ethical dimensions of eternal life.
These are the real issues we should be addressing as the first immortal generation.
As we step toward immortality, body quality will become more important than absolute numbers.
The mortals will die off and the immortals will be a new species.
I think Larry Ellison has a good understanding of the way AI will influence the world.
"AI inferencing will be used to run robotic factories, robotic cars, robotic greenhouses, biomolecular simulations for drug design, interpreting medical diagnostic images and laboratory results, automating laboratories, placing bets in financial markets, automating legal processes, automating financial processes, automating sales processes. AI is going to generate the computer programs called AI agents that will automate your sales and marketing processes. Let me repeat that. AI is going to automatically write the computer programs that will then automate your sales processes and your legal processes and everything else and in your factories and so on. Think about it."
Larry Ellison
Pretty neat
Starting from a single base LLM, R-Zero initializes two independent models with distinct roles, a Challenger and a Solver. These models are optimized separately and co-evolve through interaction: the Challenger is rewarded for proposing tasks near the edge of the Solver capability, and the Solver is rewarded for solving increasingly challenging tasks posed by the Challenger.
Basic scheme
The recipient publishes their silent payment address, a single 32 byte public key: X = x*G
The sender chooses an input containing a public key: I = i*G
The sender tweaks the silent payment address with the private key that corresponds to their chosen input: X' = hash(i*X)*G + X
SinceiX == xI (Diffie-Hellman Key Exchange), the recipient can detect the payment by calculating hash(x*I)*G + X for each input key I in the blockchain and seeing if it matches an output in the corresponding transaction.
it could create uneven distribution, some communities might get more than others.
That would be great, if the increase in distribution in some areas also coincided with more Bitcoin tolerance.
Threads helping the GC
Safepointing is a common feature of virtual machines that support multiple threads and accurate garbage collection, though usually, they are only used to stop the world rather than to request asynchronous activity from all threads.
Even though many people are prescribed (toxic) medications to lower blood pressure and cholesterol levels, lowering them does not usually lead to improved health.
Crowd Health is appropriately judging how they can get maximum benefit from a minimum of testing.
@Signal312 you have a study that shows blood pressure and cholesterol are actually irrelevant?
100 sats \ 2 replies \ @chaoticalHeavy 3 Sep \ parent \ on: Would you trust an AI doctor to diagnose you? AI
the OG application of AI proper
Since medicine is mostly memorizing stuff, a good AI will always beat doctors in diagnosis.
It ought to be deterministic
They should be able to explain themselves so a doctor can review.
This seems like a description of US here at Stacker News.
Might ACX readers be unrepresentative? Obviously yes, although it’s not clear which direction. Readers tend to be more interested in and willing to use AI than the general public, and more willing to think about speculative and controversial ideas on their own (maybe a risk factor?). But they’re also richer and more educated, and mostly understand enough about AI to avoid the pure perfect machine spirit failure mode. Overall it seems like a wash. Also, I would expect their friends and family to be less unrepresentative than they are.