I understand your point but the economics of SN are the only thing that sets it apart, both in marketing terms and in actual functional terms, for it's the mechanism that disciplines its content, regardless of how many assmilkers. I think it's an error to hide the one thing SN stands out about. Without it, it would be exactly like Hacker News, hence providing zero reason to not to use Hacker News instead. Indeed that's literally in the current slogan: "It's like Hacker News, but we pay you in Bitcoin". If we abstract the essentials away it will do more harm than good.

It's awesome. But I think it must contain the idea that you can receive bitcoin for your content, it's half of the selling point of SN (the other half being able to curate good content by supporting it with bitcoin).

As much as we love it I would try to avoid the term Zap, since anyone who sees it at a glance will not understand what we are talking about. Bitcoin is explicit to everyone!

Can we say something like

"real content pays off - in bitcoin"

That implicitly includes both the idea of giving and receiving zaps for good content, and each user will interpret it to the side of their interest. It also implicitly gives the idea that "being rewarded for real" is to receive bitcoin.

It might be a better wording to say "reducing chances of introducing vulnerabilities". The appeal of Rust is that it makes it easier to write safer code, not that it makes it impossible to write bad code. You can write code in C to be as safe as if written in Rust. And with the advent of coding agents who can check for vulnerabilities, Rust might lose its edge against C. Both will have a long and fruitful life, but nothing like a takeover will ever happen, the fundamentals of C are unparalleled.

No disciplining force greater than that of the free market. See Menger unfold.

Yes it's.

My concern came from your assertion that the "dumping", not the "reaction", is what makes you feel good.

I didn't think you where! I'm just expressing what the extent of my experience is on severe issues. Your emphasis on the superficial relief rather than on the cure was what shoot off the alarm on potential addictive-dependence. This was further emphasized by your assertion that you already had expressed yourself to a professional who parsed your inquiries and showed you they where either normal or identifiable yet being listened to and understood wasn't enough for you.

If none of those patterns match your case, could you consider rephrasing?

Pay close attention to this and this alone k00b, you are asking for prescription drugs, not a solution. A therapist is a good solution when you don't know what to say or fear to open yourself. But you don't, you do speak up. You want to keep feeling good. You want a confident who can keep the shots coming. That's because you feel empty. What makes you feel empty? That's the question you must answer first. Then go outside on your quest to get it.

Source: I have had to deal with waaaaay too many people on the verge of mental collapse up to outright suicidal meltdown. I have no idea why I have happened to encounter so many but I should have a title by now.

It hurts me to see my beloved USA dishonored this way. On one side, it deserves so much better. On the other side, sad reality is that since Trump started advocating for things Biden would have considered too far left, and yet Trump still has so much support, if there was any cheating in the 2020 elections it's now completely irrelevant, for people still got what they wanted at large. All my hopes are now in Elon's new party.

Thank you Sr :)

WooHoo!!! Awesome!! :D

Thank you again for the bounty :D

I can not avoid to think about coal, but you said that a material is not the answer. So I can only think about a black body, but thought that was too abstract, like saying "absorber", which wasn't the answer. Let me think...

I'm certain A is a superconductor, and B does behaves as a superinsulator, so what else could it be is beyond me. I'm at loss here. But really appreciate the sats, thank you :)

Got it, then A is a superconductor and B is a superinsulator, thats for sure.

You mean in abstract terms like "B is an absorbing object" while "A is a reflecting object"?

Sorry I'm lost there.. you already specified the geometry of the bodies (spherical), their consistency (solid), and want to know what the bodies are but their material is not the answer. What property is left? Or what you mean is what they could be as real life objects? That is, not "metal sphere" but "cannonball"?

Without limiting the options to a specific material, generally speaking, object B could be an amorphous arrangement of molecules (hence its light absorption, low conductivity and less weight than A), and A could be a crystalline arrangement of molecules (hence its reflectiveness , superconductivity under low temperatures, and higher immutability than B under high temperatures).

Thank you!!

New address: determinedcrab91@zeuspay.com Sadly Zeus service deprecated the previous one and to recover it I have to pay premium subscription annually. Not sure what they think that venue will end at.

Much appreciated Sr! :) I'm not active there yet! But I'm planning to!

Yakihonne all the way. Fully packaged experience. Indexed on the web. Only working UI and UX so far. Includes phone app. Regularly updated.