pull down to refresh

With the ceasefire between India and Pakistan, and for now the passing of the immediate danger of a nuclear conflict in South Asia, it would make sense to review the current world-wide nuclear state of affairs, especially as we honor those who sacrificed to protect our freedoms.
Much of the recent news has concentrated on the buildup of China’s nuclear forces and the Russian threats to use their nuclear forces against Ukraine and its allies. In addition, there have been reviews of North Korean missile tests and to what degree Iran has enriched uranium.
Although all serious developments, what is missing is an appreciation of what these four rogue states wish to do with their nuclear capability, whether numbering in advance centrifuges or dozens, hundreds, or thousands of nuclear warheads.
As has been often argued, numbers do matter in the nuclear balance. And thus, increasing numbers should be of growing concern to U.S. security analysts.
But what is it that these states wish to do with these nuclear weapons?
That’s where the rubber meets the road.
Three of the four are seeking to build “empires” of sorts while the fourth (North Korea) is a cooperative adjunct of the other three and undertakes whatever the three require.
President Putin has said he does not wish to re-create the Soviet Union. However, he apparently does want to re-create Russia as an empire, including and particularly incorporating Ukraine, the Baltics, Finland, and much of Eastern Europe. Russia is not only terrorizing Ukraine with drones and missiles but also engaging in sabotage and cyber war against nations in eastern Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. …
All can contribute to freedom’s collective security which is precisely what the Administration is seeking, and putting America first is not putting the U.S. alone. The U.S. investment in defense is now approaching $1 trillion which is necessary to protect our security and deter bad “hombres.” When measured in what it would cost the United States to buy the military fielded by China and Russia, the U.S. defense spending matches but does not exceed Moscow and Beijing. Given the United States has global obligations and security requirements, the resources applied to defense and security make sense but cannot be expected to meet all our collective and joint security needs. Real allies pull their own weight and do not depend solely on their friends for security.
Together America and her allies can pivot to the growing dangers. And if proceeding with the moral clarity of peace through strength, we can protect our security through deterrence and welcome indeed many future decades of peace and prosperity.
WTF!! What a Neo-Con crock of shite. Since when aren’t the West’s nuclear powers also rogues? Aren’t we the only ones that have dropped a nuke on a civilian inhabited city, in fact, two? What makes them rogues rather than us? Does anybody have any kind of answer to this utter and absolute insanity?
I think it's just that when you're big and strong enough, you're making the rules and almost by definition can't be a rogue. i.e. you become the standard by which rogues are judged.
reply
LOL! Yeah, except you can’t ignore the other nuclear power’s ideas, whether you want to call them rogues or not. Rogues are like terrorists, it is all in the eyes of the beholders. I just despise Neo-Cons to the max. They are nothing but warmongers and war profiteers.
reply