pull down to refresh

51 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 10 Jun \ parent \ on: Economic Bitcoin Nodes: Why You Need To Use Your Node For It To Matter bitcoin
Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that your rules' influence on the network is proportional to your economic activity?
Yes.
And, in that sense, my argument was that a set of rules with worse properties is going to lose to a set of rules with better properties, even if the economic activity on worse rules was higher.
If you mean a set of rules can lose or gain value independent of economic activity, I see what you're saying. The good set of rules wins because, assuming rational actors, a greater volume of economic value will be transacted with those rules over time, correct?
write
preview
54 sats \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 10 Jun
The good set of rules wins because, assuming rational actors, a greater volume of economic value will be transacted with those rules over time, correct?
Yes I'd agree with that
reply