pull down to refresh

Links from SN are marked as nofollow norefer noopener anyway... source and author are mentioned and linked at the end
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 11 Jun
They are only nofollow norefer noopener until they have reached a certain sat threshold of cost-to-post + zaps.
reply
that's good t know, and really good approach for validation. Well done engineering it!
Does this rule apply for all the link contained in a post or each specific link need to be clicked certain amounts of times individually before the rules get removed?
reply
All links contained in a post are subject to this rule and clicks do not affect the rule.
reply
You should start putting that info at the beginning of the post and just make it a link post!
reply
I prefer this way, don't want to push the reader away from SN
What are the pros on following your suggestion?
reply
I think it makes it clearer where the info’s coming from, it’s also about giving credit to the original site.
reply
55 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 11 Jun
I agree with @0xbitcoiner.
He also used to avoid using link posts, even though he copies content from a link. We told him that this came across as deceptive and, therefore, in poor taste.
The same applies here.
reply
I see more deceptive the fact that one need to trust the title is a good enough to give an insight of the link contents and do an extra click to reach the original content without even a small description.
Might copy the whole contents is extreme too...
reply