pull down to refresh

250 sats \ 5 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious OP 11 Jun \ parent \ on: Other clients are a menace bitcoin
If it causes your client to fork the network, it would be a menace to you. But generally, no?
If you are skilled enough to modify, patch and compile your own client (core), [which I do of course], this doesn’t really apply. Depends what one is doing…
write
preview
21 sats \ 4 replies \ @optimism 11 Jun
Agreed. So then, is it fair to say that the menace in the room isn't Knots per-se, but the endless hyperbole and influencer personalities that roam the tweeter sphere (and sometimes github / delving / mailing list)?
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious OP 11 Jun
Oh no. The menace is the alternative clients. Knots is a false path created by a sick man.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 11 Jun
False path?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious OP 11 Jun
It’s not strengthening the network, it’s delegation of thought to the lunatic fringe.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 11 Jun
You can't demand that people "strengthen" the network though. People will "weaken" the network. The point is that it ought to be robust enough to withstand this nonsense. So far, so good?
reply