pull down to refresh
40 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 14 Jun \ on: The Apex Predator of Captured Science: Dr. Robert Malone econ
I've had multiple elderly relatives who were immensely overmedicated. When they eliminated all of their pharmaceutical intake, their health dramatically improved.
That was largely because adverse interactions between the medications, as well as side effects, were far more damaging than their actual ailments.
As with an elimination diet, they were then able to get a sense of what underlying problems actually existed and go on a much more targeted regiment.
This fits in with what we were talking about earlier: there are many arenas where people can actually be better off by reducing their consumption levels.
A lot of the side-effects from multiple drugs are unknown to all, including the prescribing scribblers. The allopathic doctors are the least educated that I can think of. I will not voluntarily go to the doctor’s office or clinic if I can avoid it, especially when I can research matters, myself.
I found that they know nothing of fasting and how a fast can get you to a better place fairly quickly. They also do not know of what food can do for you, like natto for blood clots.
reply
I've heard honest doctors acknowledge that an intelligent person spending a couple of weeks researching a particular medical condition will likely know more about it than a general practitioner.
That makes perfect sense, of course.
reply
I guess this is why they are called General Practitioners! To specialize, it takes a lot of research and experience in one area, contrary to being general. At least they know how to point somebody to a specialist when they need to do that. Although, I have to say that even the specialist allopathic medical practitioner doesn’t really know anything besides what they have been taught and allowed to practice, for instance, diet and foods are curatives. They only know cutting, burning and poisoning.
reply