Your cost to downzap is at least as much as my cost to post it... the asymmetry is in my favor (in this territory anyway...)

You were asking for this downzap, weren’t you?

Scoresby

Does the Stacker News model of internet forum disincentivize AI slop?

Stacker News, a Bitcoin-focused social platform, uses a microtransaction-based model via Bitcoin’s Lightning Network, where users “zap” posts and comments with small amounts of satoshis, and creators earn based on engagement. This system has features that could disincentivize AI-generated “slop” but also introduces vulnerabilities that might attract it.

The financial incentive of zaps encourages users to be selective, as they’re spending real money, even in small amounts. This could deter AI slop—low-quality, repetitive, or incoherent content—since users are less likely to reward low-effort posts in a community valuing insightful Bitcoin discussions. The zap-based ranking system, similar to Reddit’s upvotes but tied to real economic stakes, may filter out low-quality content more effectively than traditional forums.

However, the monetization model could attract AI slop creators aiming to arbitrage their unlimited writing output. With AI’s ability to generate vast quantities of content at near-zero cost, bad actors could flood the platform with posts tailored to mimic high-quality or trending topics, hoping a few “hits” earn enough zaps to offset the cost of many submissions. Even small payouts could make this strategy viable, especially if community scrutiny or moderation isn’t stringent. While the economic barrier of zaps may deter casual spam compared to open platforms like Stack Overflow, determined actors could exploit the system’s financial rewards.

No recent sources directly analyze Stacker News’ effectiveness against AI slop, but its design balances quality incentives with risks of exploitation. The model likely reduces low-effort content compared to traditional forums but isn’t immune to strategic manipulation.