A study by the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC) in France estimates that revenue from AI-generated music will increase from $100 million in 2023 to around $4 billion in 2028. By then, the organization estimates that 20% of streaming platforms’ revenue will come from this type of music.One of the major problems with this trend is the lack of transparency. María Teresa Llano, an associate professor at the University of Sussex who studies the intersection of creativity, art and AI, emphasizes this aspect: “There’s no way for people to know if something is AI or not. [It’s not as simple as searching] for an artist you’ve come across. Right now, there’s a responsibility hanging over you. It’s the responsibility to ensure [that there’s] transparency, to make it clear whether something is generated by artificial intelligence or by humans.”
pull down to refresh
related posts
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @chovyfu 20h
I'm taking an alternative approach. Use AI to release albums, then hire musicians to play the music at live venues.
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 16 Jun
Can't people spot the AI in the woodpile? Perhaps a bit of labeling should be required for music. If it is AI label it as such.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @rootmachine 17 Jun
Indeed there is a huge problem with these AI songs. And I feel that we will suffer in the following years because of this.
As a personal note, I heard a song while waiting at the traffic lights, banging from a car and lost some minutes when I got home for tracking the song. When I found it guess what? AI generated. I am leaving the song here for people to see the level of sound AI can produce.
In my opinion Shakira's voice is tuned almost perfectly. Karol G not so good.
Check the song here:
reply