pull down to refresh

Today was a stressful day. Our electrician is Iranian. His wife and 2 kids went to Tehran 10 days ago to visit family. They cannot leave.
Tomorrow Tehran is scheduled to shut off the internet. We were able to get her money through an on the ground broker. We had to send TRC-20 USDT which I have avoided like the plague. But after swapping, and defying, and sushi'ing or whatever tf, we finally got her money in hand. Stablecoins shine more than bitcoin in immediate conflict i guess? Can someone please explain why Bitcoin could not have done this? During conflict are people that worried about overnight price exposure? Very surreal experience. I feel like i need to learn ALOT more.
Related:
Cyberattack on Iranian Sepah bank claims to have erased bank records #1008496
reply
It is kind of funny that while Bitcoin continues to separate money from state around the world, the biggest impact of crypto is an innovation that strengthens and expands the legacy monetary system
reply
You can send USDT over lightning
reply
That's live and running? I haven't really followed rgb and lightning labs lateat announcements... It's tether partnering with taro?
reply
131 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 15h
I wasn’t sure what was going on with that either but then I searched about it and apparently you can send usdt over lightning with speed wallet. I had never heard of that wallet or used it so definitely not an endorsement. Just relying the info I found.
reply
I saw the lightning labs logo under their partnerships, so must be taro then...
They also do usdt on eth and tron.
reply
The apparent success of stable-coins, to me, represents the inertia of status quo, where the USD (or its derivatives) are still more liquid and better recognised assets than Bitcoin.
After all, Iran (unsurprisingly) is not really at the forefront of Bitcoin adoption, and even if someone has like 100 BTC in Iran, he probably has no way to spend it there. So probably they recognise USD more than Bitcoins.
I am not an OG< but all it shows, is that we are still early, very very early.
reply