pull down to refresh
100 sats \ 9 replies \ @OT 23 Jun
New whirlpool client.
I wonder how many will come back to use it.
reply
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @028559d218 23 Jun
Weren't there some concerns... about the previous client? The way it handled Xpubs or something I don't know I've heard conflicting things.
There's basically one Wasabi Coordinator now (which is less than ideal) plus JoinMarket ofc.
reply
100 sats \ 3 replies \ @kruw 23 Jun
Samourai's client would collect user xpub addresses and IP addresses by default - https://web.archive.org/web/20230417145554/https://code.samourai.io/wallet/samourai-wallet-android/-/issues/458
Ashigaru says their mobile client is Tor only and requires running your own node - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5509931.0
However, this Sparrow fork doesn't enforce the node - "The default mainnet public Electrum servers that are connected to on startup are .onion URLs to preserve user privacy."
reply
7 sats \ 0 replies \ @028559d218 23 Jun
My understanding is that Ashigaru had modified that... so the xpubs don't get collected. But perhaps I misunderstood?
No offense or anything... but how do people really know any of these services aren't just huge honeypots?
There is nothing wrong with privacy. Nothing illegal or unethical. But government might not see it that way.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 23 Jun
Relevant from @1440000bytes:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5547639.0
reply
202 sats \ 0 replies \ @028559d218 23 Jun
From the "Ashigaru Open Source Project"
reply
5 sats \ 3 replies \ @OT 23 Jun
Some said all the Samurai maxis went over to monero. I'm not sure about that.
Of course Samurai and Wasabi used to sh$t on each other. Join market still going and Joinstr should be with us soon too.
reply
5 sats \ 2 replies \ @028559d218 23 Jun
Monero doesn't make sense to me. Jmo of course I could be wrong... but I don't think it's as private as they say it is.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @rottenwheel OP 27 Jun
why doesn't monero make sense to you?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @028559d218 30 Jun
I don't believe in variable-size blockchains. If fees are 'really low' then there's no demand. Or if there is lots of demand, the blocks are too big so it's too hard to run a node especially if the transactions themselves are too memory-intensive or disk-intensive.
Layering although imperfect is the only thing practical to me which Bitcoin has and Monero is fundamentally against.
reply on another page
55 sats \ 1 reply \ @Jon_Hodl 23 Jun
The minimum pool size is 2,500,000 sats and the coordinator fee is 125k sats?
This looks like an amazing development but it seems like maybe only the rich can afford privacy.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 23 Jun
To be fair I don't think they should bring back a 100k sat pool. Lightning is good enough for sending hundreds of dollars. Conjoins might make more sense for thousands.
Still,I think they should have a pool for 500k or something like that.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 23 Jun
https://k3tan.com/ashigaru-whirlpool/
reply