pull down to refresh

I think there is some truth to this. Software engineers as I know them are rather well paid, but also very aware of the privileges that come with it, so the challenge of designing a system that elevates everyone to the same level of wellbeing is definitely there (even if sometimes only as a mind game). Being an engineering discipline we also rarely deal in absolutes, rather we are aware that tradeoffs are necessary to make progress in the real world. And finally, as several people have pointed out there is also some hubris involved, since rule setting and world building is much of a software engineers daily work (but with the realism that every set of rules can be exploited, hence we don't tend to strive for perfection, rather a good enough).
Something I find stunning though is that no software engineer would think it's a good idea to go in and just refactor the entire codebase without first studying it deeply to understand how it functions, yet they think somehow it would be smart to elect commies that want to do exactly that.
reply
Haha, you mustn't know many software engineers :-)
I know plenty who have exactly this instinct, and would do it if they could get paid to do it, and the calamity that ensues would always be other people's responsibility and failure.
reply
Hmm good point lol
reply
But this is hardly specific to software engineers, as people embedded in certain contexts, it think we all tend to bring our work and context to the political table. Noatter which orientation.
reply