pull down to refresh
88 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 9h
https://recover.blitz-wallet.com/
reply
40 sats \ 1 reply \ @Slestak_Jack 6h
coinos.io has been doing something like this for a while, and it has a ton of features, including e-cash and Liquid.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @carter 4h
i love coinos especially because it is open source... The new fund feature is cool too
reply
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 7h
Interesting...
I'd like to know what exactly is happening under the hood here.
reply
10 sats \ 11 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 10h
How can a browser wallet be self-custodial? I create a wallet and sent 21 sats to it, but now I can't send anything from the new wallet. The 'send' menu gets stuck trying to open the camera (which is off), and when I hit 'paste' it gives an error, even though I’ve got an invoice copied.
reply
129 sats \ 8 replies \ @Scoresby 10h
Mutiny was a browser wallet and they were self-custody.
Blitz uses Spark, which is a statechain. Here's their tldr. It is a different trust model than Lightning. But honestly, I would do a bad job trying to explain it. It'd be very cool to see a great spark explainer on SN.
reply
97 sats \ 6 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 10h
Oh! I’m totally in the dark with this technique. Gonna read up a bit...
I remember reading somewhere around here that Spark wasn’t exactly loved by the btc maxis.
@BlakeKaufman17 ?
reply
38 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 5h
Probably because of this:
reply
5 sats \ 4 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 5h
💯
reply
55 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 5h
This should also be the definition of Layer 2 imo. if you need to trust somebody, it's not a Layer 2. So by definition, Lightning is the only Layer 2.
But other "Layer 2 solutions" probably don't like that definition, so they try to make it mean something else. But I don't know what their definition is. Anything is Layer 2 as long as it's not Layer 1?
view all 3 replies
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 7h
Oh, they aren't using lightning? I read about this a few months ago. Pretty interesting, but I thought it was still in testing.
reply
33 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 2h
Browser is just how you deliver the interface, the back-end can node be completely self-custodial (eg ShockWallet connected to your own Lightning.Pub)
To be trust-less though you'd have to self-host the interface.
In this case Blitz its using a fake L2, which is inherently custodial, so the OPs title is inaccurate.
reply
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 10h
Figured it out, browser was blocking the clipboard. 6 sats fee (28.6%)?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ACYK 8h
I wish it was standard for all wallets to have a tab that explained what types of fees you might encounter and who they’re going to. Seems this web wallet uses Spark and Breez Liquid SDK. Not sure what fees are typical with Spark. I assume the Breez liquid SDK means Boltz swap fees at least. Are there any fees for Blitz itself? Would love to see that overview somewhere. If I make a request for 100,000 sats, the receive screen says fee: 0 sats. That seems surprising.
reply
5 sats \ 0 replies \ @gbks 5h
Fees are getting quite complicated:
https://sdk-doc-liquid.breez.technology/guide/end-user_fees.html
https://docs.spark.money/home/faq#what-are-the-fees-like%3F
Seems impossible to clearly communicate to an end-user...
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @alashazam 8h
looks promising, I see most features are 'coming soon'
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 2h
You can not be self-custodial with a fake L2
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @carter 4h
I can haz api?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 7h
No Mobile? Boo
reply