pull down to refresh
88 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 26 Jun
https://recover.blitz-wallet.com/
reply
40 sats \ 3 replies \ @Slestak_Jack 26 Jun
coinos.io has been doing something like this for a while, and it has a ton of features, including e-cash and Liquid.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @carter 26 Jun
i love coinos especially because it is open source... The new fund feature is cool too
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Slestak_Jack 27 Jun
I've played around with some of the features too. Have you used the Fund feature yet?
Seems like it would be a nice tool for betting with friends and that sort of thing.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @carter 27 Jun
I even overrode the name https://coinos.io/fund/test or https://coinos.io/fund/carter
reply
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 26 Jun
Interesting...
I'd like to know what exactly is happening under the hood here.
reply
10 sats \ 11 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 26 Jun
How can a browser wallet be self-custodial? I create a wallet and sent 21 sats to it, but now I can't send anything from the new wallet. The 'send' menu gets stuck trying to open the camera (which is off), and when I hit 'paste' it gives an error, even though I’ve got an invoice copied.
reply
129 sats \ 8 replies \ @Scoresby 26 Jun
Mutiny was a browser wallet and they were self-custody.
Blitz uses Spark, which is a statechain. Here's their tldr. It is a different trust model than Lightning. But honestly, I would do a bad job trying to explain it. It'd be very cool to see a great spark explainer on SN.
reply
97 sats \ 6 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 26 Jun
Oh! I’m totally in the dark with this technique. Gonna read up a bit...
I remember reading somewhere around here that Spark wasn’t exactly loved by the btc maxis.
@BlakeKaufman17 ?
reply
38 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 26 Jun
Probably because of this:
reply
5 sats \ 4 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 26 Jun
💯
reply
55 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 26 Jun
This should also be the definition of Layer 2 imo. if you need to trust somebody, it's not a Layer 2. So by definition, Lightning is the only Layer 2.
But other "Layer 2 solutions" probably don't like that definition, so they try to make it mean something else. But I don't know what their definition is. Anything is Layer 2 as long as it's not Layer 1?
view all 3 replies
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 26 Jun
Oh, they aren't using lightning? I read about this a few months ago. Pretty interesting, but I thought it was still in testing.
reply
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 26 Jun
Figured it out, browser was blocking the clipboard. 6 sats fee (28.6%)?
reply
33 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 26 Jun
Browser is just how you deliver the interface, the back-end can node be completely self-custodial (eg ShockWallet connected to your own Lightning.Pub)
To be trust-less though you'd have to self-host the interface.
In this case Blitz its using a fake L2, which is inherently custodial, so the OPs title is inaccurate.
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @ACYK 26 Jun
I wish it was standard for all wallets to have a tab that explained what types of fees you might encounter and who they’re going to. Seems this web wallet uses Spark and Breez Liquid SDK. Not sure what fees are typical with Spark. I assume the Breez liquid SDK means Boltz swap fees at least. Are there any fees for Blitz itself? Would love to see that overview somewhere. If I make a request for 100,000 sats, the receive screen says fee: 0 sats. That seems surprising.
reply
5 sats \ 3 replies \ @gbks 26 Jun
Fees are getting quite complicated:
https://sdk-doc-liquid.breez.technology/guide/end-user_fees.html
https://docs.spark.money/home/faq#what-are-the-fees-like%3F
Seems impossible to clearly communicate to an end-user...
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @ACYK 27 Jun
Update: Just saw this at the bottom of their webpage. This is great. Just need to link to it somewhere from the app, but respect. Thats really well down.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ACYK 21h
Well done*. Not well down.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ACYK 27 Jun
Those links plus a note on what fees (if any) Blitz takes on top would be perfect. Much better than no information at all.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @alashazam 26 Jun
looks promising, I see most features are 'coming soon'
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 26 Jun
You can not be self-custodial with a fake L2
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @carter 26 Jun
I can haz api?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 26 Jun
No Mobile? Boo
reply