Video backup: https://peertube.fr/w/bpSk91mVASFAfRu4L4rG1j

In 2025, Stockholm was named the city offering the best 5G experience in Europe. Behind this announcement lies a less cheerful reality. 5G significantly increases the level of mobile phone radiation. Following the installation of 5G antennas near their homes, people who had no previous problems saw their health rapidly deteriorate. Lennart Hardell, professor of oncology, has conducted a case study of people who have developed "microwave syndrome". This study, which is the first of its kind in the world, reveals the true nature of 5G: a toxic agent imposed on the population with the complicity of health authorities who work for the health… industry.

Published case-studies demonstrate the real-life effect of 5G on human health. All studies are by oncologist and researcher Lennart Hardell from the Research Foundation for Environment & Cancer and Mona Nilsson from the Radiation Protection Foundation.

The discussion begins with an introduction to 5G technology, highlighting its faster transmission speeds and use of higher frequencies compared to 3G and 4G. A scientist notes that 5G emits significantly higher levels of microwave radiation (10 to 100 times more) than previous systems and that its deployment began without prior research into potential health effects. An oncologist introduces their background in treating cancer patients, followed by a researcher who mentions their research into mental agents and cancer risk, starting with Agent Orange.

The conversation shifts to a researcher's experience studying the effects of Agent Orange in Sweden during the 1960s and 70s, leading to research on persistent organic pollutants (like PCD) and their link to cancer. This researcher details their subsequent work over the past two decades focusing on radiofrequency radiation and cancer risks, specifically mentioning studies on mobile phone use and increased risks of brain tumors (glioma) and acoustic neuromas (two to three times higher risk with prolonged use of 10 years or more). The researcher concludes by mentioning their current focus on environmental exposure to radio frequencies from base stations, a growing concern with the expansion of 5G.

The speaker, a journalist with experience in investigative reporting and documentaries for Swedish public service radio and TV, introduces their work with Folkets Radio (People's Radio). They mention starting their own channel a few years prior, coinciding with the introduction of 5G.

The journalist describes accompanying a person measuring 5G radiation levels in Stockholm homes. They recount a specific incident in Kista, a Stockholm suburb, where they interviewed a woman of Iranian descent who complained about numerous antennas on her roof, directly above her ceiling. The journalist used a recorder and microphone to document the woman's complaints.

A journalist recounts an interview in a reportedly haunted apartment. The resident described her daughter experiencing nosebleeds and other problems, expressing desperation. The journalist, initially skeptical, agreed to sit at the kitchen table, a location the resident identified as particularly affected. After several minutes of recording, the journalist began to feel a pinching sensation in their hand and arm, intensifying over time. Upon leaving the apartment, they experienced shortness of breath and felt as though an elephant was on their chest, describing a feeling of dehydration and temporary inability to breathe. This experience marked the first time the journalist felt a significant impact from the alleged haunting.

This chapter details the concerns surrounding the 5G rollout. Scientists expressed alarm over the deployment of 5G without prior safety studies, citing potential serious health consequences due to increased radiation exposure and new frequencies. They highlighted that harmful effects from previous generations (2G, 3G, 4G) were observed at levels lower than those anticipated from 5G antennas. A journalist recounted experiencing chest pains after moving near a 5G tower, prompting them to measure radiation levels, which were found to be high. The Swedish Radiation Protection Foundation received numerous complaints about symptoms like sleeping problems, headaches, dizziness, and heart problems from individuals living near 5G base stations—symptoms consistent with those reported in studies of people residing near mobile phone masts over the past 25 years.

Dr. Lennart Ardell proposed investigating the health effects and radiation levels associated with 5G. A scientist reported eight published case studies and a summary, highlighting that these are currently the only studies examining real-life health impacts of 5G exposure. A researcher added that, to their knowledge, this type of research is unique globally. These case reports detail symptoms reported by individuals after 5G implementation nearby, aligning with "microwave syndrome" symptoms such as headaches, fatigue, sleep disturbances, muscle pain, and gastrointestinal and cardiac issues. The researcher noted the rapid onset of these symptoms in contrast to long-term effects like cancer (which haven't been studied in this context). They mentioned that research on this topic in Sweden began around 2020.

The researcher discusses the long-term and acute health effects of radiofrequency radiation, noting that cancer risk may appear after 10-20 years, while some individuals experience acute symptoms. Many affected people may be unaware of the connection between their symptoms and radiofrequency radiation. The researcher highlights that relocation often leads to symptom disappearance within days, suggesting a causal link. An affected person describes their experience living near an antenna for years. After a recent upgrade resulting in significantly larger and more directly aimed antennas, they began experiencing nightly heart palpitations starting around 10 or 11 PM, continuing until they left their home. The affected person notes the proximity of the antenna (approximately 22 meters) to their apartment.

Affected Person described experiencing fatigue, headaches, and a subsequent incident where their ex-partner, after a short visit, also reported brain pain and distress, questioning if a nearby 5G antenna was the cause. Affected Person corroborated this, stating that since November 2021, after living in their house for 10 years, they noticed a worsening of symptoms. They linked this to the installation of a new antenna, possibly 5G, based on information received from Swedish mobile operators. Before the antenna's appearance, no such issues were present.

An affected person describes experiencing symptoms after a 5G installation in their building. They observed a measurable effect (micro-vogs) and contacted someone to measure it. The 5G installation preceded the measurement. After the 5G installation, the affected person experienced a rapid onset of symptoms including hair loss, tingling, tinnitus, and skin issues. They attempted to mitigate the symptoms by changing rooms, finding some but not significant improvement. The affected person considered the placebo effect but continued to experience symptoms despite attempts to isolate the cause and test their reactions in different environments.

The Affected Person described experiencing the same symptoms upon returning home. Another speaker noted a call during a converter issue. A second Affected Person recounted observing a manufacturing error—a flipped component. This individual contacted someone who, upon seeing a related illustration (possibly "Mikagogus"), questioned the standup's growth and ultimately refused a purchase due to the issue. The conversation appears to center around a product defect and subsequent customer service interaction.

The Affected Person details measurements of electromagnetic radiation. Before installation, levels were 6000 mW per m². Post-installation, measurements showed at least 2.5 million mW per m², particularly high near Kerstin's side of the bed, despite antennas being 5-7 meters away. Due to these high levels, the Affected Person and their partner moved to a smaller apartment (30 square meters) for two weeks. Upon returning home and re-entering the affected area, the Affected Person experienced symptoms including skin redness (hudrodnad).

The affected person describes experiencing tinnitus and nosebleeds. They explain their inability to visit a specific location due to their symptoms and their decision to fly to Kerstin instead. The symptoms appeared several days after returning from a local area, leading them to believe their neighborhood was the source.

The researcher mentions previous measurements taken using a different technology. While not low, these measurements were in the range of thousands of microwaves per square meter.

A researcher describes a case where an affected person experienced a significant increase in symptoms after the installation of a 5G network. The affected person reports previously tolerating 3G and 4G radiation, but experiencing extreme, previously unknown pain and other symptoms upon 5G deployment. These symptoms were severe enough that the affected person feared for their life and connected their symptoms to the new antenna. The individual's symptoms were so debilitating that they were forced to leave their apartment, fearing homelessness if they couldn't resolve the situation. Even brief visits to retrieve belongings resulted in a recurrence of severe symptoms within six to eight hours, lasting until the following day. Headaches were also noted as a recurring symptom.

The Affected Person describes experiencing severe headaches and increased sensitivity to RF exposure, to the point of being unable to use a Bluetooth mouse, a device they had used for years without issue. The sensitivity worsened after increased exposure in their apartment. The Scientist then explains that government and industry claims of 5G radiation safety are based on limits that only address immediate heating effects from high exposure, neglecting potential long-term effects like cancer, sleep problems, headaches, and heart issues. These limits, recommended by organizations like ICNIP, WHO, and the European Commission, are criticized for prioritizing industry interests over public health.

The discussion begins with the revelation that the World Health Organization received funding from the telecommunications industry for promoting exposure limits. The ICNIRP is also criticized for its industry ties. A researcher then highlights the concerns surrounding 5G technology's MIMO (multiple inputs and multiple outputs) feature, describing it as a bombarding of the human body due to its rapid on and off pulses. The researcher explains that this rapid pulsing prevents cellular repair mechanisms from adequately addressing the radiation damage, unlike in situations where radiation exposure is less frequent, allowing for cellular repair. The researcher draws a parallel to radiotherapy, noting that dividing a radiation dose throughout the day is more toxic to cancer cells due to the reduced opportunity for cellular repair. This lack of repair time in the context of 5G's rapid pulsing is presented as a significant concern.

Researcher discusses the effect of radiation given with short intervals. An affected person describes their heightened sensitivity to Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, experiencing severe illness after moving to a new apartment due to increased RF exposure from neighbors' devices (Bluetooth speakers, Wi-Fi routers, mesh networks). They conclude that modern society, with its high levels of RF exposure, is making people sick.

A scientist presents information from a 2017 Ericsson presentation regarding the impact of EMF limits on 5G network deployment. The presentation highlights the "exclusion zone," an area where people cannot live or stay for extended periods due to high RF exposure. The scientist explains that if EMF limits were 100 times stricter than the ICNIP limits, the exclusion zone would dramatically increase, making 5G rollout significantly more difficult or even impossible due to the drastically expanded area where people could not reside.

The researcher describes a location with numerous 5G base stations, noting their proximity to pedestrians and the resulting high radiation exposure. Measurements of 14-15 volts per meter are reported, with potential for much higher levels (30-40 volts per meter) depending on location, nearing the 50 volts per meter threshold associated with increased cancer risk in animal studies. The researcher highlights the potential for microwave syndrome due to radiofrequency radiation. The researcher further explains that the high density of buildings and narrow streets in the old town necessitates high radiation levels from base stations to achieve coverage, criticizing the technology's design and societal control. The researcher emphasizes the invisible nature of the radiation, making it an undetectable environmental risk factor, similar to dioxins.

The discussion centers on the increasing levels of harmful emissions, described as a "silent cancer agent," and their connection to the 5G rollout. A scientist explains that exposure limits are typically set to protect the public, requiring industry adaptation. However, in the case of 5G, limits were set to accommodate industry needs, evidenced by pressure exerted on countries like Italy, Brussels, and Switzerland to adopt less protective limits to facilitate deployment. A researcher presents measurements from ten schools in Hørebro showing high radiation levels (30,000-40,000 microwatts per square meter), exceeding toxic levels identified in various studies. The researcher highlights children's increased sensitivity to radiation and links the high radiation levels to reported tiredness and headaches among schoolchildren, raising concerns about the widespread use of wireless technology in schools. The discussion is cut off mid-sentence.

A scientist reveals that 5G rollout primarily serves industry needs, not the public. Despite reported serious health effects, the industry, particularly Ericsson, shows no interest in their research and actively attempts to suppress it. An example cited is Ericsson's request to withdraw a published case study. The scientist emphasizes the industry's lack of interest in objective health effect investigations and their actions to cover up health hazards. A researcher supports this, highlighting the importance of case reports as early warning signs, similar to canary birds in coal mines, indicating potential problems. They emphasize that while case studies are a first step, further research is needed. The scientist concludes by pointing out the forced exposure of the public to 5G radiation without informed consent or supporting studies.

A scientist argues that growing evidence suggests harmful health effects from 5G and 6G, contradicting claims of safety. This situation is deemed undemocratic, highlighting the industry's excessive influence on risk management. The scientist criticizes organizations like ICNIRP, the World Health Organization, and the European Commission for failing to adequately protect the public. A researcher supports this, stating that from a purely medical perspective, 5G and 6G shouldn't exist due to potential health risks, despite powerful opposing forces. The researcher's advice is to dismantle 5G, referring to the current situation as a toxic agency forced upon humanity. The moderator then thanks the speakers.