My first flex reaction to this was that this is going to put great advantage to centralized AI-as-a-service, as many people will be querying it so it will have a much broader corpus of experience or wisdom than what a sovereign AI would be exposed to, but then I remembered garbage in, garbage out.
If there is a separate, digital, dimension of experience, this can be exchanged. For example: if you have llama4[carter] and I have llama4[opti], then we can trade our disparate experience weights and meld them, like I would fork a llama4[opti(0.8)+carter(0.2)] which would - I hope for both our sakes - outperform chatgpt4[big_booty_cougar(1e9)] (didn't make that up, #1013688, lol)
There are all kinds of crazy ideas downstream of that.
experienceorwisdomthan what a sovereign AI would be exposed to, but then I remembered garbage in, garbage out.experience, this can be exchanged. For example: if you havellama4[carter]and I havellama4[opti], then we can trade our disparateexperienceweights and meld them, like I would fork allama4[opti(0.8)+carter(0.2)]which would - I hope for both our sakes - outperformchatgpt4[big_booty_cougar(1e9)](didn't make that up, #1013688, lol)