pull down to refresh

It's good to think critically... In BTC terms the miner revenue is decreasing
But in USD terms the miner revenue is on a long-term upward trajectory.
Interesting that the text doesn't actually say that.
Isn't this highly misleading?
All of these options would allow for more transactions to be included into the blockchain. Since there's still demand to transact on Bitcoin - just not at high fees - scaling can enable more transactions with smaller fees, forming a sustainable security budget. No need for terabyte blocks. If Bitcoin could process 500 TPS instead of 5, the average fee needed to replace the current subsidy would drop to a feasible $1.12 per transaction (at June 28, 2025 rates). This aligns with Bitcoin's original design and doesn't affect decentralization in any bad way
Why don't they mention the Lightning network?