pull down to refresh
311 sats \ 2 replies \ @justin_shocknet 8 Jul \ on: Ask SN: Nostr client vs website nostr
Most nostr apps are clients, not websites, and that's the problem.
By clients I mean data is loading directly from relays and being organized on the device/browser locally for display. This is slow, bad UX.
Primal is the least bad because they have indexers to partially pre-load stuff so the client and relay don't do all the work.
The protocol is fine for an open network apps can have automatic user generated content from, it's just that developers are amateurs that don't know anything about architecture.
There's so much to do still to make nostr usable at scale it will make your head spin, and no one is doing it.
I prefer website like ShockWallet
reply
I hope to get back to the nostr-social side of things eventually and make something that works, still a lot to do on the wallet/node side though :-\
reply