pull down to refresh
50 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 9 Jul \ on: Mapping the entire field of autism causation studies in one article econ
I remember some of the covid treatment studies were setup so preposterously that they were clearly designed to not find any effectiveness of "alternative" treatments.
Some gave doses of medicines at levels known to be toxic. Others gave just one component of what was meant to be a regiment of several treatments.
To a lay person, they just see that an enormous number of studies didn't find anything. It's not like any of us have the time or expertise to dissect every medical study.
This guy boiled it down to whether there was a real control group or not. The control group was the totally unvaccinated children and the treatment group was the vaccinated children. Only six out of about a thousand peer-reviewed papers were finally winnowed out. The only reason, apparently, for not having more is that the researchers were forever cut off from research funds if they were seriously working with vaccines. That is the political means being used in a economics situation. It may also be the reason RFKjr gets turfed out pretty damn soon, now.
reply
Yeah, I've read about that issue before. It is a tough empirical issue, because unvaccinated kids are unlike vaccinated kids in a bunch of different ways.
reply
Yes, usually in health outcomes. The well vaccinated kids seem to have all sorts of problems with their bodies and minds, starting from peanut allergies to the made-up ADHD or ADD.
Two of my kids got by with much lesser vaccinations and medicine than the third. My third kid had pneumonia when he was only 4 months old and his blood oxygen dropped to what they told me was 48%, which was near-fatal. He spent two weeks under a tent in the hospital getting a steady drip of medicines. He is now the least healthy of the three. We tried to limit vaccines as much as possible.
reply