is a really good term. I need to start a list of all these little nuggets people are sharing that I want to think about.
Upon reflection, I'm wondering if my question wasn't naive: what I wanted to ask was "are there bitcoin developers who have strong, interesting ideas for bitcoin, but as they get involved in the process and get recognition for their contributions, slowly merge towards an average?" but it is also true that Bitcoin development has to please its users or they won't use it.
Oh, bitcoin devs get audience captured too. I often wonder if I am, although I’m more of an app guy I suppose. Maybe we should be using liquid somehow? Maybe we should KYC people? Is my bias away from these things my bias?
is a really good term. I need to start a list of all these little nuggets people are sharing that I want to think about.
Upon reflection, I'm wondering if my question wasn't naive: what I wanted to ask was "are there bitcoin developers who have strong, interesting ideas for bitcoin, but as they get involved in the process and get recognition for their contributions, slowly merge towards an average?" but it is also true that Bitcoin development has to please its users or they won't use it.