pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @CruncherDefi 13h \ parent \ on: Lopp proposes Post Quantum Migration BIP bitcoin
Such a quantum threat would also be a quantum miner, making key-cracking superfluous.
Wtf are you talking about. Quantum threat is only about breaking key-signing of UTXOs.
When it comes to mining, quantum algos improves SHA generation only slightly, nothing game changing.
Anyways its clear from this post that you are clueless, so its an end-of-topic from my side.
write
preview
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @justin_shocknet 13h
clueless
You're fudding a computing hoax going back to the 70's thats still not doing anything, yea you're a real expert
Coherence of the number of qubits needed to crack a signing key is exactly as achievable as brute forcing it, it's a scam, same difficulty with new wording
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @CruncherDefi 13h
yea you're a real expert
I wouldn't go that far, but nevertheless I added my remarks to the PR discussion for this BIP. I encourage you to do the same on the github PR page! Surely you have some useful insight to share with the community xDDD
reply
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @itsrealfake 7h
I encourage you to do the same on the github PR page!
yeah @justin_shocknet, just remember to be nice or they'll have a good reason to BAN YOU.
reply