I'm not familiar with Islam, but one can make this claim about anything, including bitcoin. People should not be deported on the basis of politics either imo.
Not really, because bitcoiners for example, are adherents of the non aggression principle, which Muslims, collectively, are not. They bring violence with them wherever they go, particularly to advance their political agenda. This is historical fact.
Not really, because bitcoiners for example, are adherents of the non aggression principle, which Muslims, collectively, are not
As a NAP person, I don't commit aggression against, nor do I believe we should deport, individuals based on interpretations of what a heterogenous collective is "collectively" even when cribbed as "historical fact."
If you care about maintaining public safety and ensuring the survival of civilization, then you don't have the luxury of not judging groups collectively. It's a classic case of market failure, where liberty of a minority must be suspended for the collective good.
No, people shouldn't be deported based on their religion, and beliefs should not be outlawed.
However, I do believe that Western elites are too sanguine about the threat of Islam. Westerners are so afraid of being labeled racists and bigots that they aren't able to speak freely and rationally about differences between cultures
all of your options suck. I don't know where you live, but in my country there are WAY more people who want to instill christian theocracy than shia, and there's currently no deporting citizens.
NO, AND DEPORTATIONS SHOULDN'T BE DONE ON THE BASIS OF RELIGIONEven though Islam isn't a religion, rather a subversive political movement, yes?
I'm not familiar with Islam, but one can make this claim about anything, including bitcoin. People should not be deported on the basis of politics either imo.
Not really, because bitcoiners for example, are adherents of the non aggression principle, which Muslims, collectively, are not. They bring violence with them wherever they go, particularly to advance their political agenda. This is historical fact.
As a NAP person, I don't commit aggression against, nor do I believe we should deport, individuals based on interpretations of what a heterogenous collective is "collectively" even when cribbed as "historical fact."
If you care about maintaining public safety and ensuring the survival of civilization, then you don't have the luxury of not judging groups collectively. It's a classic case of market failure, where liberty of a minority must be suspended for the collective good.
All religions are
All Muslims are not violent.I'm sure some of them may be violent. It's a human thing, I think, more than a religion thing.
No, people shouldn't be deported based on their religion, and beliefs should not be outlawed.
However, I do believe that Western elites are too sanguine about the threat of Islam. Westerners are so afraid of being labeled racists and bigots that they aren't able to speak freely and rationally about differences between cultures
all of your options suck. I don't know where you live, but in my country there are WAY more people who want to instill christian theocracy than shia, and there's currently no deporting citizens.
You paid 10K to boost this?