pull down to refresh
184 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 20h \ on: How peer review became so easy to exploit by AI AI
The volume is interesting: too many papers are being submitted for reviewers to actually look at all of them, so reviewers turn to using llms.
This implies there is more demand for reviewers, but if so, why isn't the market delivering it?
The submitters aren't being asked to pay for it. Feedback loop is broken.
More broadly, the system’s been broken for a while but the resources to exploit it were limited.
reply