pull down to refresh

102 sats \ 4 replies \ @optimism 21 Jul \ on: Yet Another Bad Analysis of AI - Jeffrey Shallit AI
I would argue that not only is it is reasonable to say that there a "mind" in some LLM's, it is actually a representation of pieces of thousands or millions of minds. I think that is a much more useful way to think about them.
An "aggregation" of millions of minds. It's interesting to see what happens when we reinforce the quality output (ourselves - this may be subjective) and remove the slop; would it become less sloppy?
write
preview
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby OP 21 Jul
Rarely do I find the result of one of my queries to be slop. Frequently do I find the outputs posted by other people to be slop. This probably has nothing to do with the results, and everything that I'm looking for when reading.
When I query, most of the time I'm looking for something in the output, not the framing of the output -- which is often the slop part.
I doubt the thing that makes outputs feel like slop can really be reinforced away.
reply
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 21 Jul
I always tell chatbots to reply in prose and to absolutely not use bullet points because I've grown allergic to these.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @itsrealfake 21 Jul
An "aggregation" of the output of millions of minds.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 21 Jul
Ah yes! Thanks!
reply