pull down to refresh

It's a tough problem in general. Whoever's funding and conducting any research will have some agenda they'd like to advance. Even people who think they're being objective have this problem.
My rule of thumb is to just give zero weight to any information coming from people or institutions who have been caught lying before.
Whoever's funding and conducting any research will have some agenda they'd like to advance.
This is why we don't trust, we verify.
reply
That's pretty limiting. There are a lot of things that have been researched that would be literally impossible to verify by yourself.
reply
It is, but the information that you need to either create information of your own, or directly make important decisions against is often of either of a controllable size, or addressable with a reliability variable that turns hard numbers that may be wrong into ranges that could be right.
Information warfare is all around us, has been for a long time too. This article proves it once more and hopefully wef fans will ask themselves if their tribe is actually doing good (but I doubt it, we'll probably see some doubling down through normalization).
All we can do is control our controllables, know when we're making assumptions and find where we are fed bullcrap, intentionally or otherwise. Country rankings is of course a logical prime candidate for informational warfare. I wouldn't be surprised if the spook's handbook, eurostat and the OECD do the same, but hopefully for them with a bit more finesse.
reply
I give about the same weight to anyone being funded by the organization that needs those really favorable results to make more sales and income. These “scientists” could be more properly called prostitutes, IMHO. I take liars voices to be the same as the wind, for who pays any attention to the sound of the wind?
reply
47 sats \ 1 reply \ @kepford 21 Jul
This is my approach. I never trust liars. Period. They might be telling a truth today but I don't trust them. If applied this means you can't trust pretty much all political figures. Including ones I may agree with sometimes.
reply
This is one of the reasons I so often couch statements with things like "Something I've heard is [insert claim], which makes some sense to me."
I'm pretty reluctant to make strong claims about many things anymore.
reply